Risk assessment and water management

Jan Jaap Bouma, Delphine François, Peter A Troch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to implement water management in a sustainable way, the related decision-making processes have to take the ecological and socio-economic consequences into account. In The Netherlands, policy makers struggle with the question of how they can deal with flood risks. This paper presents some results of a research project sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Water management in order to develop a risk assessment approach that assists decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. It shows that dealing with risk in decision-making related to water management manifests itself in different ways. One aspect is the incorporation of risk in the process of valuation of socio-economic effects. Another aspect is the incorporation of the valued socio-economic effects into the decision-making process. The paper shows that different attitudes towards risk determine to a large extent how the valued effects are assessed. This element has been widely discussed in the literature. The results are innovative in that they also show that risk attitudes and the understanding of the risk concept interfere with the outcome of the decision-making process in the field of water management. The paper provides an approach to how the concept of risk can be operationalized in different ways by decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. The approach is applied in two case studies. The results show that different institutional contexts impose different ways of dealing with risks which may significantly change over time (discount rates, risk attitudes, relevance of ecological effects, etc.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-151
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Modelling and Software
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Water management
Risk assessment
water management
risk assessment
Decision making
decision making
Economic and social effects
discount rate
ecological economics
valuation
Economics

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Flooding
  • Risk assessment
  • Valuation
  • Water management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Risk assessment and water management. / Bouma, Jan Jaap; François, Delphine; Troch, Peter A.

In: Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 20, No. 2, 02.2005, p. 141-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bouma, Jan Jaap ; François, Delphine ; Troch, Peter A. / Risk assessment and water management. In: Environmental Modelling and Software. 2005 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 141-151.
@article{cf8cb6cc14d748c6a2997b3b438c2ee3,
title = "Risk assessment and water management",
abstract = "In order to implement water management in a sustainable way, the related decision-making processes have to take the ecological and socio-economic consequences into account. In The Netherlands, policy makers struggle with the question of how they can deal with flood risks. This paper presents some results of a research project sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Water management in order to develop a risk assessment approach that assists decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. It shows that dealing with risk in decision-making related to water management manifests itself in different ways. One aspect is the incorporation of risk in the process of valuation of socio-economic effects. Another aspect is the incorporation of the valued socio-economic effects into the decision-making process. The paper shows that different attitudes towards risk determine to a large extent how the valued effects are assessed. This element has been widely discussed in the literature. The results are innovative in that they also show that risk attitudes and the understanding of the risk concept interfere with the outcome of the decision-making process in the field of water management. The paper provides an approach to how the concept of risk can be operationalized in different ways by decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. The approach is applied in two case studies. The results show that different institutional contexts impose different ways of dealing with risks which may significantly change over time (discount rates, risk attitudes, relevance of ecological effects, etc.).",
keywords = "Cost-benefit analysis, Flooding, Risk assessment, Valuation, Water management",
author = "Bouma, {Jan Jaap} and Delphine Fran{\cc}ois and Troch, {Peter A}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "141--151",
journal = "Environmental Modelling and Software",
issn = "1364-8152",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk assessment and water management

AU - Bouma, Jan Jaap

AU - François, Delphine

AU - Troch, Peter A

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - In order to implement water management in a sustainable way, the related decision-making processes have to take the ecological and socio-economic consequences into account. In The Netherlands, policy makers struggle with the question of how they can deal with flood risks. This paper presents some results of a research project sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Water management in order to develop a risk assessment approach that assists decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. It shows that dealing with risk in decision-making related to water management manifests itself in different ways. One aspect is the incorporation of risk in the process of valuation of socio-economic effects. Another aspect is the incorporation of the valued socio-economic effects into the decision-making process. The paper shows that different attitudes towards risk determine to a large extent how the valued effects are assessed. This element has been widely discussed in the literature. The results are innovative in that they also show that risk attitudes and the understanding of the risk concept interfere with the outcome of the decision-making process in the field of water management. The paper provides an approach to how the concept of risk can be operationalized in different ways by decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. The approach is applied in two case studies. The results show that different institutional contexts impose different ways of dealing with risks which may significantly change over time (discount rates, risk attitudes, relevance of ecological effects, etc.).

AB - In order to implement water management in a sustainable way, the related decision-making processes have to take the ecological and socio-economic consequences into account. In The Netherlands, policy makers struggle with the question of how they can deal with flood risks. This paper presents some results of a research project sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Water management in order to develop a risk assessment approach that assists decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. It shows that dealing with risk in decision-making related to water management manifests itself in different ways. One aspect is the incorporation of risk in the process of valuation of socio-economic effects. Another aspect is the incorporation of the valued socio-economic effects into the decision-making process. The paper shows that different attitudes towards risk determine to a large extent how the valued effects are assessed. This element has been widely discussed in the literature. The results are innovative in that they also show that risk attitudes and the understanding of the risk concept interfere with the outcome of the decision-making process in the field of water management. The paper provides an approach to how the concept of risk can be operationalized in different ways by decision-makers in dealing with flood risks. The approach is applied in two case studies. The results show that different institutional contexts impose different ways of dealing with risks which may significantly change over time (discount rates, risk attitudes, relevance of ecological effects, etc.).

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Flooding

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Valuation

KW - Water management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444278102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444278102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4444278102

VL - 20

SP - 141

EP - 151

JO - Environmental Modelling and Software

JF - Environmental Modelling and Software

SN - 1364-8152

IS - 2

ER -