Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine in the Emergency Department

A Critical Appraisal

William K. Mallon, Samuel M Keim, Jan M. Shoenberger, Ron M. Walls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Two methods of paralysis are available for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department (ED): depolarizing agents such as succinylcholine, and non-depolarizing drugs such as rocuronium. Rocuronium is a useful alternative when succinylcholine is contraindicated. Contraindications to succinylcholine include allergy, history of malignant hyperthermia, denervation syndromes, and patients who are 24-48 h post burn or crush injury. Non-depolarizing drugs have the advantage of causing less pain due to post-paralysis myalgias. Clinical Question: Can rocuronium replace succinylcholine as the paralytic of choice for RSI in the ED? Evidence Review: Four relevant studies were selected from an evidence search and a structured review performed. Results: For the outcomes of clinically acceptable intubation conditions and time to onset, the two agents were not statistically significantly different. Succinylcholine seems to produce conditions that have higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Succinylcholine remains the drug of choice for ED RSI unless there is a contraindication to its usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-188
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Succinylcholine
Hospital Emergency Service
Intubation
Paralysis
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Malignant Hyperthermia
Myalgia
Denervation
rocuronium
Hypersensitivity
Pain

Keywords

  • EBM
  • evidence-based medicine
  • intubation
  • rapid sequence intubation
  • rocuronium
  • RSI
  • succinylcholine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine in the Emergency Department : A Critical Appraisal. / Mallon, William K.; Keim, Samuel M; Shoenberger, Jan M.; Walls, Ron M.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 2, 08.2009, p. 183-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mallon, William K. ; Keim, Samuel M ; Shoenberger, Jan M. ; Walls, Ron M. / Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine in the Emergency Department : A Critical Appraisal. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 183-188.
@article{090c633954e24d0987dc56652993eec6,
title = "Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine in the Emergency Department: A Critical Appraisal",
abstract = "Background: Two methods of paralysis are available for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department (ED): depolarizing agents such as succinylcholine, and non-depolarizing drugs such as rocuronium. Rocuronium is a useful alternative when succinylcholine is contraindicated. Contraindications to succinylcholine include allergy, history of malignant hyperthermia, denervation syndromes, and patients who are 24-48 h post burn or crush injury. Non-depolarizing drugs have the advantage of causing less pain due to post-paralysis myalgias. Clinical Question: Can rocuronium replace succinylcholine as the paralytic of choice for RSI in the ED? Evidence Review: Four relevant studies were selected from an evidence search and a structured review performed. Results: For the outcomes of clinically acceptable intubation conditions and time to onset, the two agents were not statistically significantly different. Succinylcholine seems to produce conditions that have higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Succinylcholine remains the drug of choice for ED RSI unless there is a contraindication to its usage.",
keywords = "EBM, evidence-based medicine, intubation, rapid sequence intubation, rocuronium, RSI, succinylcholine",
author = "Mallon, {William K.} and Keim, {Samuel M} and Shoenberger, {Jan M.} and Walls, {Ron M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.07.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "183--188",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine in the Emergency Department

T2 - A Critical Appraisal

AU - Mallon, William K.

AU - Keim, Samuel M

AU - Shoenberger, Jan M.

AU - Walls, Ron M.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Background: Two methods of paralysis are available for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department (ED): depolarizing agents such as succinylcholine, and non-depolarizing drugs such as rocuronium. Rocuronium is a useful alternative when succinylcholine is contraindicated. Contraindications to succinylcholine include allergy, history of malignant hyperthermia, denervation syndromes, and patients who are 24-48 h post burn or crush injury. Non-depolarizing drugs have the advantage of causing less pain due to post-paralysis myalgias. Clinical Question: Can rocuronium replace succinylcholine as the paralytic of choice for RSI in the ED? Evidence Review: Four relevant studies were selected from an evidence search and a structured review performed. Results: For the outcomes of clinically acceptable intubation conditions and time to onset, the two agents were not statistically significantly different. Succinylcholine seems to produce conditions that have higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Succinylcholine remains the drug of choice for ED RSI unless there is a contraindication to its usage.

AB - Background: Two methods of paralysis are available for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department (ED): depolarizing agents such as succinylcholine, and non-depolarizing drugs such as rocuronium. Rocuronium is a useful alternative when succinylcholine is contraindicated. Contraindications to succinylcholine include allergy, history of malignant hyperthermia, denervation syndromes, and patients who are 24-48 h post burn or crush injury. Non-depolarizing drugs have the advantage of causing less pain due to post-paralysis myalgias. Clinical Question: Can rocuronium replace succinylcholine as the paralytic of choice for RSI in the ED? Evidence Review: Four relevant studies were selected from an evidence search and a structured review performed. Results: For the outcomes of clinically acceptable intubation conditions and time to onset, the two agents were not statistically significantly different. Succinylcholine seems to produce conditions that have higher satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Succinylcholine remains the drug of choice for ED RSI unless there is a contraindication to its usage.

KW - EBM

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - intubation

KW - rapid sequence intubation

KW - rocuronium

KW - RSI

KW - succinylcholine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651176027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651176027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.07.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.07.021

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 183

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -