Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing

Thomas A. Pyszczynski, Jeff Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

224 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tested the hypothesis that individuals engage in more thorough attributional processing for unexpected events than they do for expected events. 51 undergraduates observed the experimenter asking a confederate either a small or large favor. The small request led to an expectancy of compliance; the large request led to expectancy of refusal. The confederate then either did or did not comply with the request, thus either confirming or disconfirming Ss' expectancies. Ss were than allowed to look at any 5 of the confederates' responses to a 10-item questionnaire that the confederate had supposedly filled out earlier. Five of the items on the questionnaire were relevant to helping, and 5 were of general interest. As predicted, Ss chose more helping-relevant items when their expectancies had been disconfirmed. Implications for attributions for the behavior of stereotyped out-group members are discussed. (33 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-38
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • confederate compliance confirming vs disconfirming Ss' expectancies, attributions of confederates' helping behavior, college students, implications for attributions of stereotyped out group members

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this