Running from the shadow: Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves

Jeff Schimel, Jeff L Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, Heather O'Mahen, Jamie Arndt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four experiments tested the hypothesis that people distance themselves from others who display characteristics they fear in themselves. In Study 1, participants were given false feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were given information about a person who became angry and responded in a violent or nonviolent manner. High anger feedback participants distanced themselves only from the violent person. In Study 2, high anger feedback led to distancing from a violent other but not a dishonest other, whereas dishonesty feedback led to distancing from a dishonest other but not a violent other. The results of Studies 3 and 4 replicated and extended the distancing effect with an anger induction: Participants who were insulted distanced themselves from an angry/violent person, and verbalizing their emotions about being insulted eliminated this effect. Implications for understanding defenses against undesirable self-attributions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-462
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume78
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anger
anger
Fear
Psychology
anxiety
human being
induction
attribution
Emotions
emotion
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Running from the shadow : Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves. / Schimel, Jeff; Greenberg, Jeff L; Pyszczynski, Tom; O'Mahen, Heather; Arndt, Jamie.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 3, 03.2000, p. 446-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6e1f61ac4c44c5cb7d68ae7f235db3f,
title = "Running from the shadow: Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves",
abstract = "Four experiments tested the hypothesis that people distance themselves from others who display characteristics they fear in themselves. In Study 1, participants were given false feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were given information about a person who became angry and responded in a violent or nonviolent manner. High anger feedback participants distanced themselves only from the violent person. In Study 2, high anger feedback led to distancing from a violent other but not a dishonest other, whereas dishonesty feedback led to distancing from a dishonest other but not a violent other. The results of Studies 3 and 4 replicated and extended the distancing effect with an anger induction: Participants who were insulted distanced themselves from an angry/violent person, and verbalizing their emotions about being insulted eliminated this effect. Implications for understanding defenses against undesirable self-attributions are discussed.",
author = "Jeff Schimel and Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Tom Pyszczynski and Heather O'Mahen and Jamie Arndt",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "446--462",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Running from the shadow

T2 - Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves

AU - Schimel, Jeff

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Pyszczynski, Tom

AU - O'Mahen, Heather

AU - Arndt, Jamie

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Four experiments tested the hypothesis that people distance themselves from others who display characteristics they fear in themselves. In Study 1, participants were given false feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were given information about a person who became angry and responded in a violent or nonviolent manner. High anger feedback participants distanced themselves only from the violent person. In Study 2, high anger feedback led to distancing from a violent other but not a dishonest other, whereas dishonesty feedback led to distancing from a dishonest other but not a violent other. The results of Studies 3 and 4 replicated and extended the distancing effect with an anger induction: Participants who were insulted distanced themselves from an angry/violent person, and verbalizing their emotions about being insulted eliminated this effect. Implications for understanding defenses against undesirable self-attributions are discussed.

AB - Four experiments tested the hypothesis that people distance themselves from others who display characteristics they fear in themselves. In Study 1, participants were given false feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were given information about a person who became angry and responded in a violent or nonviolent manner. High anger feedback participants distanced themselves only from the violent person. In Study 2, high anger feedback led to distancing from a violent other but not a dishonest other, whereas dishonesty feedback led to distancing from a dishonest other but not a violent other. The results of Studies 3 and 4 replicated and extended the distancing effect with an anger induction: Participants who were insulted distanced themselves from an angry/violent person, and verbalizing their emotions about being insulted eliminated this effect. Implications for understanding defenses against undesirable self-attributions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034146258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034146258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10743873

AN - SCOPUS:0034146258

VL - 78

SP - 446

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -