Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival

a statewide population-based study

Jihye Park, Brenna E. Blackburn, Kerry Rowe, John Snyder, Yuan Wan, Vikrant Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Alison Fraser, Ken Smith, Kim Herget, Lindsay Burt, Theresa Werner, David K. Gaffney, Ana Maria Lopez, Kathi Mooney, Mia Hashibe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival, we assessed ovarian cancer mortality and differences in prognostic factors by rural-metropolitan residence. Methods: The Utah Population Database was used to identify ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2012. Residential location information at the time of cancer diagnosis was used to stratify rural-metropolitan residence. All-cause death and ovarian cancer death risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Among 1661 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 11.8% were living in rural counties of Utah. Although ovarian cancer patients residing in rural counties had different characteristics compared with metropolitan residents, we did not observe an association between rural residence and risk of all-cause nor ovarian cancer–specific death after adjusting for confounders. However, among rural residents, ovarian cancer mortality risk was very high in older age at diagnosis and for mucinous carcinoma, and low in overweight at baseline. Conclusions: Rural residence was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer death. Nevertheless, patients residing in rural-metropolitan areas had different factors affecting the risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-specific death. Further research is needed to quantify how mortality risk can differ by residential location accounting for degree of health care access and lifestyle-related factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-384
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ovarian Neoplasms
Survival
Population
Mortality
Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
Proportional Hazards Models
Life Style
Cause of Death
Neoplasms
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Ovarian cancer
  • Rural
  • Survivorship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Park, J., Blackburn, B. E., Rowe, K., Snyder, J., Wan, Y., Deshmukh, V., ... Hashibe, M. (2018). Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival: a statewide population-based study. Annals of Epidemiology, 28(6), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019

Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival : a statewide population-based study. / Park, Jihye; Blackburn, Brenna E.; Rowe, Kerry; Snyder, John; Wan, Yuan; Deshmukh, Vikrant; Newman, Michael; Fraser, Alison; Smith, Ken; Herget, Kim; Burt, Lindsay; Werner, Theresa; Gaffney, David K.; Lopez, Ana Maria; Mooney, Kathi; Hashibe, Mia.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 377-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, J, Blackburn, BE, Rowe, K, Snyder, J, Wan, Y, Deshmukh, V, Newman, M, Fraser, A, Smith, K, Herget, K, Burt, L, Werner, T, Gaffney, DK, Lopez, AM, Mooney, K & Hashibe, M 2018, 'Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival: a statewide population-based study', Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019
Park, Jihye ; Blackburn, Brenna E. ; Rowe, Kerry ; Snyder, John ; Wan, Yuan ; Deshmukh, Vikrant ; Newman, Michael ; Fraser, Alison ; Smith, Ken ; Herget, Kim ; Burt, Lindsay ; Werner, Theresa ; Gaffney, David K. ; Lopez, Ana Maria ; Mooney, Kathi ; Hashibe, Mia. / Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival : a statewide population-based study. In: Annals of Epidemiology. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 377-384.
@article{1f6c0c3c5fb44ec8acbdadb677961e5f,
title = "Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival: a statewide population-based study",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival, we assessed ovarian cancer mortality and differences in prognostic factors by rural-metropolitan residence. Methods: The Utah Population Database was used to identify ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2012. Residential location information at the time of cancer diagnosis was used to stratify rural-metropolitan residence. All-cause death and ovarian cancer death risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Among 1661 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 11.8{\%} were living in rural counties of Utah. Although ovarian cancer patients residing in rural counties had different characteristics compared with metropolitan residents, we did not observe an association between rural residence and risk of all-cause nor ovarian cancer–specific death after adjusting for confounders. However, among rural residents, ovarian cancer mortality risk was very high in older age at diagnosis and for mucinous carcinoma, and low in overweight at baseline. Conclusions: Rural residence was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer death. Nevertheless, patients residing in rural-metropolitan areas had different factors affecting the risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-specific death. Further research is needed to quantify how mortality risk can differ by residential location accounting for degree of health care access and lifestyle-related factors.",
keywords = "Ovarian cancer, Rural, Survivorship",
author = "Jihye Park and Blackburn, {Brenna E.} and Kerry Rowe and John Snyder and Yuan Wan and Vikrant Deshmukh and Michael Newman and Alison Fraser and Ken Smith and Kim Herget and Lindsay Burt and Theresa Werner and Gaffney, {David K.} and Lopez, {Ana Maria} and Kathi Mooney and Mia Hashibe",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "377--384",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival

T2 - a statewide population-based study

AU - Park, Jihye

AU - Blackburn, Brenna E.

AU - Rowe, Kerry

AU - Snyder, John

AU - Wan, Yuan

AU - Deshmukh, Vikrant

AU - Newman, Michael

AU - Fraser, Alison

AU - Smith, Ken

AU - Herget, Kim

AU - Burt, Lindsay

AU - Werner, Theresa

AU - Gaffney, David K.

AU - Lopez, Ana Maria

AU - Mooney, Kathi

AU - Hashibe, Mia

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival, we assessed ovarian cancer mortality and differences in prognostic factors by rural-metropolitan residence. Methods: The Utah Population Database was used to identify ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2012. Residential location information at the time of cancer diagnosis was used to stratify rural-metropolitan residence. All-cause death and ovarian cancer death risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Among 1661 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 11.8% were living in rural counties of Utah. Although ovarian cancer patients residing in rural counties had different characteristics compared with metropolitan residents, we did not observe an association between rural residence and risk of all-cause nor ovarian cancer–specific death after adjusting for confounders. However, among rural residents, ovarian cancer mortality risk was very high in older age at diagnosis and for mucinous carcinoma, and low in overweight at baseline. Conclusions: Rural residence was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer death. Nevertheless, patients residing in rural-metropolitan areas had different factors affecting the risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-specific death. Further research is needed to quantify how mortality risk can differ by residential location accounting for degree of health care access and lifestyle-related factors.

AB - Purpose: To investigate rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival, we assessed ovarian cancer mortality and differences in prognostic factors by rural-metropolitan residence. Methods: The Utah Population Database was used to identify ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2012. Residential location information at the time of cancer diagnosis was used to stratify rural-metropolitan residence. All-cause death and ovarian cancer death risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Among 1661 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 11.8% were living in rural counties of Utah. Although ovarian cancer patients residing in rural counties had different characteristics compared with metropolitan residents, we did not observe an association between rural residence and risk of all-cause nor ovarian cancer–specific death after adjusting for confounders. However, among rural residents, ovarian cancer mortality risk was very high in older age at diagnosis and for mucinous carcinoma, and low in overweight at baseline. Conclusions: Rural residence was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer death. Nevertheless, patients residing in rural-metropolitan areas had different factors affecting the risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-specific death. Further research is needed to quantify how mortality risk can differ by residential location accounting for degree of health care access and lifestyle-related factors.

KW - Ovarian cancer

KW - Rural

KW - Survivorship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046128966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046128966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.019

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 377

EP - 384

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 6

ER -