Sacroiliac Fusion: Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute

Robert W. Bina, R. John Hurlbert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pain related to joint dysfunction can be treated with joint fusion; this is a long-standing principle of musculoskeletal surgery. However, pain arising from the sacroiliac (SI) joint is difficult to diagnose. Several implant devices are available that promote fusion by simply crossing the joint space. Evidence establishing outcomes is misleading because of vague diagnostic criteria, flawed methodology, bias, and limited follow-up. Because of nonstandardized indications and historically inferior reconstruction techniques, SI joint fusion should be considered unproven. The indications and procedure in their present form are unlikely to stand up to close scrutiny or weather the test of time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-320
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgery Clinics of North America
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magic
Sacroiliac Joint
Joints
Pain
Weather
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Evidence
  • Quackery
  • Spinal fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Sacroiliac Fusion : Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute. / Bina, Robert W.; Hurlbert, R. John.

In: Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, Vol. 28, No. 3, 07.2017, p. 313-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5fe5d55d0b09423e853095db31708622,
title = "Sacroiliac Fusion: Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute",
abstract = "Pain related to joint dysfunction can be treated with joint fusion; this is a long-standing principle of musculoskeletal surgery. However, pain arising from the sacroiliac (SI) joint is difficult to diagnose. Several implant devices are available that promote fusion by simply crossing the joint space. Evidence establishing outcomes is misleading because of vague diagnostic criteria, flawed methodology, bias, and limited follow-up. Because of nonstandardized indications and historically inferior reconstruction techniques, SI joint fusion should be considered unproven. The indications and procedure in their present form are unlikely to stand up to close scrutiny or weather the test of time.",
keywords = "Back pain, Evidence, Quackery, Spinal fusion",
author = "Bina, {Robert W.} and Hurlbert, {R. John}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "313--320",
journal = "Neurosurgery Clinics of North America",
issn = "1042-3680",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sacroiliac Fusion

T2 - Another “Magic Bullet” Destined for Disrepute

AU - Bina, Robert W.

AU - Hurlbert, R. John

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - Pain related to joint dysfunction can be treated with joint fusion; this is a long-standing principle of musculoskeletal surgery. However, pain arising from the sacroiliac (SI) joint is difficult to diagnose. Several implant devices are available that promote fusion by simply crossing the joint space. Evidence establishing outcomes is misleading because of vague diagnostic criteria, flawed methodology, bias, and limited follow-up. Because of nonstandardized indications and historically inferior reconstruction techniques, SI joint fusion should be considered unproven. The indications and procedure in their present form are unlikely to stand up to close scrutiny or weather the test of time.

AB - Pain related to joint dysfunction can be treated with joint fusion; this is a long-standing principle of musculoskeletal surgery. However, pain arising from the sacroiliac (SI) joint is difficult to diagnose. Several implant devices are available that promote fusion by simply crossing the joint space. Evidence establishing outcomes is misleading because of vague diagnostic criteria, flawed methodology, bias, and limited follow-up. Because of nonstandardized indications and historically inferior reconstruction techniques, SI joint fusion should be considered unproven. The indications and procedure in their present form are unlikely to stand up to close scrutiny or weather the test of time.

KW - Back pain

KW - Evidence

KW - Quackery

KW - Spinal fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020929924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020929924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.001

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28600005

AN - SCOPUS:85020929924

VL - 28

SP - 313

EP - 320

JO - Neurosurgery Clinics of North America

JF - Neurosurgery Clinics of North America

SN - 1042-3680

IS - 3

ER -