Sampling and tracking a changing environment

Persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees

Aimee S. Dunlap, Daniel R Papaj, Anna Dornhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of when to collect new information and how to apply that information is central to much of behaviour. Theory suggests that the value of collecting information, or sampling, depends on environmental persistence and on the relative costs of making wrong decisions. However, empirical tests of how these variables interact are lacking.We tested whether bumblebee foraging decisions are indeed influenced by these two factors. We gave bees repeated choices between a resource providing a steady, mediocre reward and a resource fluctuating between a low reward and a high reward. In this paradigm, we manipulated environmental persistence by changing how long the quality of a fluctuating resource remained stable at one reward level. We manipulated the costs of decision errors by changing the relative values of the available rewards. Bees sampled the fluctuating resource more frequently when it changed quality more frequently, indicating that they measured environmental persistence and reacted to it as predicted by theory. Bees showed surprisingly suboptimal tracking, not reliably choosing the currently best resource except when the fluctuating resource was very persistent and the potential rewards high. While bees modify their choices in response to different levels of change and potential rewards, they do not always do so according to optimality predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20160149
JournalInterface Focus
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 6 2017

Fingerprint

Reward
Sampling
Bees
Costs
Decision making
Costs and Cost Analysis
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Bombus
  • Foraging theory
  • Information use
  • Optimal foraging
  • Plasticity
  • Sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Bioengineering
  • Biophysics
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Sampling and tracking a changing environment : Persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees. / Dunlap, Aimee S.; Papaj, Daniel R; Dornhaus, Anna.

In: Interface Focus, Vol. 7, No. 3, 20160149, 06.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2eda81c831974598be443c22e067b414,
title = "Sampling and tracking a changing environment: Persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees",
abstract = "The question of when to collect new information and how to apply that information is central to much of behaviour. Theory suggests that the value of collecting information, or sampling, depends on environmental persistence and on the relative costs of making wrong decisions. However, empirical tests of how these variables interact are lacking.We tested whether bumblebee foraging decisions are indeed influenced by these two factors. We gave bees repeated choices between a resource providing a steady, mediocre reward and a resource fluctuating between a low reward and a high reward. In this paradigm, we manipulated environmental persistence by changing how long the quality of a fluctuating resource remained stable at one reward level. We manipulated the costs of decision errors by changing the relative values of the available rewards. Bees sampled the fluctuating resource more frequently when it changed quality more frequently, indicating that they measured environmental persistence and reacted to it as predicted by theory. Bees showed surprisingly suboptimal tracking, not reliably choosing the currently best resource except when the fluctuating resource was very persistent and the potential rewards high. While bees modify their choices in response to different levels of change and potential rewards, they do not always do so according to optimality predictions.",
keywords = "Bombus, Foraging theory, Information use, Optimal foraging, Plasticity, Sampling",
author = "Dunlap, {Aimee S.} and Papaj, {Daniel R} and Anna Dornhaus",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Interface Focus",
issn = "2042-8898",
publisher = "Royal Society Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sampling and tracking a changing environment

T2 - Persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees

AU - Dunlap, Aimee S.

AU - Papaj, Daniel R

AU - Dornhaus, Anna

PY - 2017/6/6

Y1 - 2017/6/6

N2 - The question of when to collect new information and how to apply that information is central to much of behaviour. Theory suggests that the value of collecting information, or sampling, depends on environmental persistence and on the relative costs of making wrong decisions. However, empirical tests of how these variables interact are lacking.We tested whether bumblebee foraging decisions are indeed influenced by these two factors. We gave bees repeated choices between a resource providing a steady, mediocre reward and a resource fluctuating between a low reward and a high reward. In this paradigm, we manipulated environmental persistence by changing how long the quality of a fluctuating resource remained stable at one reward level. We manipulated the costs of decision errors by changing the relative values of the available rewards. Bees sampled the fluctuating resource more frequently when it changed quality more frequently, indicating that they measured environmental persistence and reacted to it as predicted by theory. Bees showed surprisingly suboptimal tracking, not reliably choosing the currently best resource except when the fluctuating resource was very persistent and the potential rewards high. While bees modify their choices in response to different levels of change and potential rewards, they do not always do so according to optimality predictions.

AB - The question of when to collect new information and how to apply that information is central to much of behaviour. Theory suggests that the value of collecting information, or sampling, depends on environmental persistence and on the relative costs of making wrong decisions. However, empirical tests of how these variables interact are lacking.We tested whether bumblebee foraging decisions are indeed influenced by these two factors. We gave bees repeated choices between a resource providing a steady, mediocre reward and a resource fluctuating between a low reward and a high reward. In this paradigm, we manipulated environmental persistence by changing how long the quality of a fluctuating resource remained stable at one reward level. We manipulated the costs of decision errors by changing the relative values of the available rewards. Bees sampled the fluctuating resource more frequently when it changed quality more frequently, indicating that they measured environmental persistence and reacted to it as predicted by theory. Bees showed surprisingly suboptimal tracking, not reliably choosing the currently best resource except when the fluctuating resource was very persistent and the potential rewards high. While bees modify their choices in response to different levels of change and potential rewards, they do not always do so according to optimality predictions.

KW - Bombus

KW - Foraging theory

KW - Information use

KW - Optimal foraging

KW - Plasticity

KW - Sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018684159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018684159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149

DO - 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Interface Focus

JF - Interface Focus

SN - 2042-8898

IS - 3

M1 - 20160149

ER -