Science, policy, activism, and war: Defining the health of Gulf War veterans

Stephen Zavestoski, Phil Brown, Meadow Linder, Sabrina McCormick, Brian Mayer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many servicemen and women began suffering from a variety of symptoms and illnesses soon after the 1991 Gulf War. Some veterans believe that their illnesses are related to toxic exposures during their service, though scientific research has been largely unable to demonstrate any link. Disputes over the definition, etiology, and treatment of Gulf War - related illnesses (GWRIs) continue. The authors examine the roles of science, policy, and veteran activism in developing an understanding of GWRIs. They argue that the government's stress-based explanation of GWRIs and its insistence on a scientific link between service in the gulf and veteran illnesses forced veterans to shift from pleas for care, treatment, and compensation on moral grounds to engagement in the scientific process and debates over the interpretation of scientific findings. The authors compare the experiences of veterans to those of breast cancer activists to explain the stages of illness contestation in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-205
Number of pages35
JournalScience Technology and Human Values
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Science, policy, activism, and war: Defining the health of Gulf War veterans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this