Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair

Spiridon Botsios, Johannes Frömke, Gerhard Walterbusch, Karl Schuermann, Sreekumar - Subramanian, Jan Reinstadler, Guido Dohmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique-specific complications at mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta. Methods Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5%) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions. Results The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2-83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19). Two perioperative deaths were observed following surgical therapy. During the mean follow-up of 78.06 ± 37.37 months (range, 23-142 months) after TEVAR, four unrelated deaths occurred, two patients were lost to follow-up, and four patients required a further intervention. Conclusions Secondary intervention after endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta was not infrequently required and can be performed with acceptable risks. However, serial, systematic follow-up is essential to detect late complications and to perform secondary procedures, preferably under elective circumstances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-73
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiac Surgery
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Thorax
Thoracic Aorta
Stents
Endoleak
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Lost to Follow-Up
Standard of Care
Hematoma
Dissection
Mortality
Incidence
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Botsios, S., Frömke, J., Walterbusch, G., Schuermann, K., Subramanian, S. ., Reinstadler, J., & Dohmen, G. (2014). Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 29(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12252

Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair. / Botsios, Spiridon; Frömke, Johannes; Walterbusch, Gerhard; Schuermann, Karl; Subramanian, Sreekumar -; Reinstadler, Jan; Dohmen, Guido.

In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 66-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Botsios, S, Frömke, J, Walterbusch, G, Schuermann, K, Subramanian, S, Reinstadler, J & Dohmen, G 2014, 'Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair', Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12252
Botsios S, Frömke J, Walterbusch G, Schuermann K, Subramanian S, Reinstadler J et al. Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2014 Jan;29(1):66-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12252
Botsios, Spiridon ; Frömke, Johannes ; Walterbusch, Gerhard ; Schuermann, Karl ; Subramanian, Sreekumar - ; Reinstadler, Jan ; Dohmen, Guido. / Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair. In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 66-73.
@article{d221c1f22c2a429cb3d7ec5ebb690a16,
title = "Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair",
abstract = "Background Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique-specific complications at mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta. Methods Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5{\%}) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions. Results The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2-83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.5{\%} (2/19). Two perioperative deaths were observed following surgical therapy. During the mean follow-up of 78.06 ± 37.37 months (range, 23-142 months) after TEVAR, four unrelated deaths occurred, two patients were lost to follow-up, and four patients required a further intervention. Conclusions Secondary intervention after endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta was not infrequently required and can be performed with acceptable risks. However, serial, systematic follow-up is essential to detect late complications and to perform secondary procedures, preferably under elective circumstances.",
author = "Spiridon Botsios and Johannes Fr{\"o}mke and Gerhard Walterbusch and Karl Schuermann and Subramanian, {Sreekumar -} and Jan Reinstadler and Guido Dohmen",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocs.12252",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "66--73",
journal = "Journal of Cardiac Surgery",
issn = "0886-0440",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary interventions after endovascular thoracic aortic repair

AU - Botsios, Spiridon

AU - Frömke, Johannes

AU - Walterbusch, Gerhard

AU - Schuermann, Karl

AU - Subramanian, Sreekumar -

AU - Reinstadler, Jan

AU - Dohmen, Guido

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Background Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique-specific complications at mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta. Methods Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5%) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions. Results The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2-83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19). Two perioperative deaths were observed following surgical therapy. During the mean follow-up of 78.06 ± 37.37 months (range, 23-142 months) after TEVAR, four unrelated deaths occurred, two patients were lost to follow-up, and four patients required a further intervention. Conclusions Secondary intervention after endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta was not infrequently required and can be performed with acceptable risks. However, serial, systematic follow-up is essential to detect late complications and to perform secondary procedures, preferably under elective circumstances.

AB - Background Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique-specific complications at mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta. Methods Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5%) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions. Results The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2-83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19). Two perioperative deaths were observed following surgical therapy. During the mean follow-up of 78.06 ± 37.37 months (range, 23-142 months) after TEVAR, four unrelated deaths occurred, two patients were lost to follow-up, and four patients required a further intervention. Conclusions Secondary intervention after endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta was not infrequently required and can be performed with acceptable risks. However, serial, systematic follow-up is essential to detect late complications and to perform secondary procedures, preferably under elective circumstances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891834504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891834504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocs.12252

DO - 10.1111/jocs.12252

M3 - Article

C2 - 24279879

AN - SCOPUS:84891834504

VL - 29

SP - 66

EP - 73

JO - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

SN - 0886-0440

IS - 1

ER -