Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines

California experience

Philip I Harber, Barbara O. Wynn, Yee Wei Lim, Soeren Mattke, Steven M. Asch, Teryl K. Nuckols

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. METHODS: On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. RESULTS: Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1282-1292
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workers' Compensation
Guidelines
Los Angeles
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines : California experience. / Harber, Philip I; Wynn, Barbara O.; Lim, Yee Wei; Mattke, Soeren; Asch, Steven M.; Nuckols, Teryl K.

In: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 11, 11.2008, p. 1282-1292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harber, Philip I ; Wynn, Barbara O. ; Lim, Yee Wei ; Mattke, Soeren ; Asch, Steven M. ; Nuckols, Teryl K. / Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines : California experience. In: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 50, No. 11. pp. 1282-1292.
@article{25f927063d684bb094616b0bfb055915,
title = "Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines: California experience",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. METHODS: On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. RESULTS: Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.",
author = "Harber, {Philip I} and Wynn, {Barbara O.} and Lim, {Yee Wei} and Soeren Mattke and Asch, {Steven M.} and Nuckols, {Teryl K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181841fb4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1282--1292",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines

T2 - California experience

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Wynn, Barbara O.

AU - Lim, Yee Wei

AU - Mattke, Soeren

AU - Asch, Steven M.

AU - Nuckols, Teryl K.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. METHODS: On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. RESULTS: Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. METHODS: On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. RESULTS: Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65849236328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65849236328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181841fb4

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181841fb4

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 1282

EP - 1292

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 11

ER -