Self-organizing moral systems: Beyond social contract theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay examines two different modes of reasoning about justice: an individual mode in which each individual judges what we all ought to do and a social mode in which we seek to reconcile our judgments of justice so that we can share common rules of justice. Social contract theory has traditionally emphasized the second, reconciliation mode, devising a central plan (the contract) to do so. However, I argue that because we disagree not only in our judgments of justice but also about the degree of reconciliation justice calls for, the social contract presupposes a single, controversial, answer to the proper degree of reconciliation. In place of the social contract’s ‘top-down’ approach, this article explores the idea of self-organizing moral systems, in which each individual, acting on her own views of justice (including the importance of reconciliation), responds to the decisions of others, forming systems of shared justice. Several basic agent-based models are explored to begin to understand the dynamics under which individuals with diverse views of justice may come to share common rules. It is found that, surprisingly, by increasing the diversity in a system, we can sometimes increase the possibility of agreement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-147
Number of pages29
JournalPolitics, Philosophy and Economics
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

contract theory
social system
justice
reconciliation
Social contract theory
Self-organizing
Justice
Social Contract Theory
Organizing
Reconciliation

Keywords

  • diversity
  • public reason
  • self-organization
  • social contract
  • social morality
  • spontaneous order

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Self-organizing moral systems : Beyond social contract theory. / Gaus, Gerald F.

In: Politics, Philosophy and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 119-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{951b4434aa634837a424175f804ea0f6,
title = "Self-organizing moral systems: Beyond social contract theory",
abstract = "This essay examines two different modes of reasoning about justice: an individual mode in which each individual judges what we all ought to do and a social mode in which we seek to reconcile our judgments of justice so that we can share common rules of justice. Social contract theory has traditionally emphasized the second, reconciliation mode, devising a central plan (the contract) to do so. However, I argue that because we disagree not only in our judgments of justice but also about the degree of reconciliation justice calls for, the social contract presupposes a single, controversial, answer to the proper degree of reconciliation. In place of the social contract’s ‘top-down’ approach, this article explores the idea of self-organizing moral systems, in which each individual, acting on her own views of justice (including the importance of reconciliation), responds to the decisions of others, forming systems of shared justice. Several basic agent-based models are explored to begin to understand the dynamics under which individuals with diverse views of justice may come to share common rules. It is found that, surprisingly, by increasing the diversity in a system, we can sometimes increase the possibility of agreement.",
keywords = "diversity, public reason, self-organization, social contract, social morality, spontaneous order",
author = "Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1470594X17719425",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "119--147",
journal = "Politics, Philosophy and Economics",
issn = "1470-594X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-organizing moral systems

T2 - Beyond social contract theory

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - This essay examines two different modes of reasoning about justice: an individual mode in which each individual judges what we all ought to do and a social mode in which we seek to reconcile our judgments of justice so that we can share common rules of justice. Social contract theory has traditionally emphasized the second, reconciliation mode, devising a central plan (the contract) to do so. However, I argue that because we disagree not only in our judgments of justice but also about the degree of reconciliation justice calls for, the social contract presupposes a single, controversial, answer to the proper degree of reconciliation. In place of the social contract’s ‘top-down’ approach, this article explores the idea of self-organizing moral systems, in which each individual, acting on her own views of justice (including the importance of reconciliation), responds to the decisions of others, forming systems of shared justice. Several basic agent-based models are explored to begin to understand the dynamics under which individuals with diverse views of justice may come to share common rules. It is found that, surprisingly, by increasing the diversity in a system, we can sometimes increase the possibility of agreement.

AB - This essay examines two different modes of reasoning about justice: an individual mode in which each individual judges what we all ought to do and a social mode in which we seek to reconcile our judgments of justice so that we can share common rules of justice. Social contract theory has traditionally emphasized the second, reconciliation mode, devising a central plan (the contract) to do so. However, I argue that because we disagree not only in our judgments of justice but also about the degree of reconciliation justice calls for, the social contract presupposes a single, controversial, answer to the proper degree of reconciliation. In place of the social contract’s ‘top-down’ approach, this article explores the idea of self-organizing moral systems, in which each individual, acting on her own views of justice (including the importance of reconciliation), responds to the decisions of others, forming systems of shared justice. Several basic agent-based models are explored to begin to understand the dynamics under which individuals with diverse views of justice may come to share common rules. It is found that, surprisingly, by increasing the diversity in a system, we can sometimes increase the possibility of agreement.

KW - diversity

KW - public reason

KW - self-organization

KW - social contract

KW - social morality

KW - spontaneous order

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046823104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046823104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1470594X17719425

DO - 10.1177/1470594X17719425

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046823104

VL - 17

SP - 119

EP - 147

JO - Politics, Philosophy and Economics

JF - Politics, Philosophy and Economics

SN - 1470-594X

IS - 2

ER -