Sensitivity to grammatical marking in English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasics

Janet L Nicol, C. Jakubowicz, M. C. Goldblum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the sensitivity of English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasic subjects to grammatical marking such as number and gender. Using a sentence-picture matching paradigm we tested sentences in which grammatical marking appeared in one position only: e.g. That sheep crossed the stream vs The goat crossed the stream vs The sheep is crossing the stream vs The sheep crosses the stream. Performance across sentence types varied according to two factors: (1) marking within the noun phrase was easier for subjects to discern than marking which appeared outside the noun phrase; (2) marking which was an inherent feature of a free (unbound) morpheme was associated with better performance than marking which was affixal in nature. These factors were relevant for subjects from both language groups, despite differences between languages in terms of probability of grammatical marking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-622
Number of pages30
JournalAphasiology
Volume10
Issue number6
StatePublished - Aug 1996

Fingerprint

speaking
Sheep
Language
language group
Goats
performance
paradigm
gender
language
Aphasic
Noun Phrase
Paradigm
Goat
Language Groups
Sentence Type
Morpheme
Group Differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Sensitivity to grammatical marking in English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasics. / Nicol, Janet L; Jakubowicz, C.; Goldblum, M. C.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 08.1996, p. 593-622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicol, Janet L ; Jakubowicz, C. ; Goldblum, M. C. / Sensitivity to grammatical marking in English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasics. In: Aphasiology. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 593-622.
@article{95671fbc1e02437d875320a18fb9ef63,
title = "Sensitivity to grammatical marking in English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasics",
abstract = "We examine the sensitivity of English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasic subjects to grammatical marking such as number and gender. Using a sentence-picture matching paradigm we tested sentences in which grammatical marking appeared in one position only: e.g. That sheep crossed the stream vs The goat crossed the stream vs The sheep is crossing the stream vs The sheep crosses the stream. Performance across sentence types varied according to two factors: (1) marking within the noun phrase was easier for subjects to discern than marking which appeared outside the noun phrase; (2) marking which was an inherent feature of a free (unbound) morpheme was associated with better performance than marking which was affixal in nature. These factors were relevant for subjects from both language groups, despite differences between languages in terms of probability of grammatical marking.",
author = "Nicol, {Janet L} and C. Jakubowicz and Goldblum, {M. C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "593--622",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity to grammatical marking in English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasics

AU - Nicol, Janet L

AU - Jakubowicz, C.

AU - Goldblum, M. C.

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - We examine the sensitivity of English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasic subjects to grammatical marking such as number and gender. Using a sentence-picture matching paradigm we tested sentences in which grammatical marking appeared in one position only: e.g. That sheep crossed the stream vs The goat crossed the stream vs The sheep is crossing the stream vs The sheep crosses the stream. Performance across sentence types varied according to two factors: (1) marking within the noun phrase was easier for subjects to discern than marking which appeared outside the noun phrase; (2) marking which was an inherent feature of a free (unbound) morpheme was associated with better performance than marking which was affixal in nature. These factors were relevant for subjects from both language groups, despite differences between languages in terms of probability of grammatical marking.

AB - We examine the sensitivity of English-speaking and French-speaking non-fluent aphasic subjects to grammatical marking such as number and gender. Using a sentence-picture matching paradigm we tested sentences in which grammatical marking appeared in one position only: e.g. That sheep crossed the stream vs The goat crossed the stream vs The sheep is crossing the stream vs The sheep crosses the stream. Performance across sentence types varied according to two factors: (1) marking within the noun phrase was easier for subjects to discern than marking which appeared outside the noun phrase; (2) marking which was an inherent feature of a free (unbound) morpheme was associated with better performance than marking which was affixal in nature. These factors were relevant for subjects from both language groups, despite differences between languages in terms of probability of grammatical marking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029841633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029841633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029841633

VL - 10

SP - 593

EP - 622

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 6

ER -