Sensitivity to propositional units in good reading

Steven J. Muncer, Thomas G Bever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Good readers detect fewer silent /e/s at the end of a clause than at the beginning in printed English text. Relatively poor (but normal) readers do not show this difference. This result suggests that good reading involves fluctuations in visual attention that respond to propositional units, in the same way as does auditory attention in normal listening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-279
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
fluctuation
Reader
Clause
Fluctuations
Hearing
Visual Attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Sensitivity to propositional units in good reading. / Muncer, Steven J.; Bever, Thomas G.

In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 07.1984, p. 275-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b4d21d000864a89904564de34624c1b,
title = "Sensitivity to propositional units in good reading",
abstract = "Good readers detect fewer silent /e/s at the end of a clause than at the beginning in printed English text. Relatively poor (but normal) readers do not show this difference. This result suggests that good reading involves fluctuations in visual attention that respond to propositional units, in the same way as does auditory attention in normal listening.",
author = "Muncer, {Steven J.} and Bever, {Thomas G}",
year = "1984",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/BF01076837",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "275--279",
journal = "Journal of Psycholinguistic Research",
issn = "0090-6905",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity to propositional units in good reading

AU - Muncer, Steven J.

AU - Bever, Thomas G

PY - 1984/7

Y1 - 1984/7

N2 - Good readers detect fewer silent /e/s at the end of a clause than at the beginning in printed English text. Relatively poor (but normal) readers do not show this difference. This result suggests that good reading involves fluctuations in visual attention that respond to propositional units, in the same way as does auditory attention in normal listening.

AB - Good readers detect fewer silent /e/s at the end of a clause than at the beginning in printed English text. Relatively poor (but normal) readers do not show this difference. This result suggests that good reading involves fluctuations in visual attention that respond to propositional units, in the same way as does auditory attention in normal listening.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248888633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248888633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01076837

DO - 10.1007/BF01076837

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248888633

VL - 13

SP - 275

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

SN - 0090-6905

IS - 4

ER -