Sepsis bundles and compliance with clinical guidelines

Lisa Stoneking, Kurt Denninghoff, Lawrence DeLuca, Samuel M. Keim, Benson Munger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Realizing the vast medical benefits of validated protocols, recommendations and practice guidelines requires acceptance and implementation by frontline care providers. Knowledge translation is the science of accelerating the transfer of knowledge to practice by understanding and creatively addressing the barriers that prevent adoption of new professional standards. In an attempt to improve patient care and reduce mortality, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and The Institute for Healthcare Improvement created the resuscitation and management bundles for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. These bundles have been accepted as best practice by many clinicians since multiple clinical trials have produced similar positive results when they were implemented. However, transferring these research outcomes-based guidelines to the clinical practice arena has been associated with poor compliance due to important barriers to implementation. Delays in the adoption of sepsis bundles are not surprising since the time from validation to implementation of a new clinical practice is typically 17 years. Using sepsis bundles as a model, this article explores why guidelines are important, examines physician adherence to protocols, and reviews the literature on strategies to improve clinical compliance and enhance knowledge translation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-182
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Intensive Care Medicine
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Keywords

  • compliance
  • early goal-directed therapy
  • guidelines
  • knowledge translation
  • sepsis bundles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sepsis bundles and compliance with clinical guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this