Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era

Michael R. Ransom, Sharon Bernstein Megdal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

To examine the relative pay of women in the academic labor market between about 1965 and about 1985, we analyse data from several national surveys as well as information from individual institutions. We also review extensively the published research on this issue. We find that although the relative pay of women in higher education has improved since the late 1960s, women's salaries still fall short of men's salaries. Many theories imply that labor market discrimination not only lowers the pay of women but also increases the pay of men. We examine this issue using a new technique that generalizes the well-known Oaxaca decomposition. We estimate that discrimination in higher education has had little effect on men's salaries. We also examine trends in employment and the segregation of women and men faculty by field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-43
Number of pages23
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this