Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era

Michael R. Ransom, Sharon B Megdal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the relative pay of women in the academic labor market between about 1965 and about 1985, we analyse data from several national surveys as well as information from individual institutions. We also review extensively the published research on this issue. We find that although the relative pay of women in higher education has improved since the late 1960s, women's salaries still fall short of men's salaries. Many theories imply that labor market discrimination not only lowers the pay of women but also increases the pay of men. We examine this issue using a new technique that generalizes the well-known Oaxaca decomposition. We estimate that discrimination in higher education has had little effect on men's salaries. We also examine trends in employment and the segregation of women and men faculty by field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-43
Number of pages23
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

affirmative action
labor market
salary
discrimination
segregation
education
Affirmative action
Sex differences
Labour market
trend
Salary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Education

Cite this

Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era. / Ransom, Michael R.; Megdal, Sharon B.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1993, p. 21-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87388a33d494445386dc99a4f1be5278,
title = "Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era",
abstract = "To examine the relative pay of women in the academic labor market between about 1965 and about 1985, we analyse data from several national surveys as well as information from individual institutions. We also review extensively the published research on this issue. We find that although the relative pay of women in higher education has improved since the late 1960s, women's salaries still fall short of men's salaries. Many theories imply that labor market discrimination not only lowers the pay of women but also increases the pay of men. We examine this issue using a new technique that generalizes the well-known Oaxaca decomposition. We estimate that discrimination in higher education has had little effect on men's salaries. We also examine trends in employment and the segregation of women and men faculty by field.",
author = "Ransom, {Michael R.} and Megdal, {Sharon B}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0272-7757(93)90041-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "21--43",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era

AU - Ransom, Michael R.

AU - Megdal, Sharon B

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - To examine the relative pay of women in the academic labor market between about 1965 and about 1985, we analyse data from several national surveys as well as information from individual institutions. We also review extensively the published research on this issue. We find that although the relative pay of women in higher education has improved since the late 1960s, women's salaries still fall short of men's salaries. Many theories imply that labor market discrimination not only lowers the pay of women but also increases the pay of men. We examine this issue using a new technique that generalizes the well-known Oaxaca decomposition. We estimate that discrimination in higher education has had little effect on men's salaries. We also examine trends in employment and the segregation of women and men faculty by field.

AB - To examine the relative pay of women in the academic labor market between about 1965 and about 1985, we analyse data from several national surveys as well as information from individual institutions. We also review extensively the published research on this issue. We find that although the relative pay of women in higher education has improved since the late 1960s, women's salaries still fall short of men's salaries. Many theories imply that labor market discrimination not only lowers the pay of women but also increases the pay of men. We examine this issue using a new technique that generalizes the well-known Oaxaca decomposition. We estimate that discrimination in higher education has had little effect on men's salaries. We also examine trends in employment and the segregation of women and men faculty by field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249007181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249007181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0272-7757(93)90041-E

DO - 10.1016/0272-7757(93)90041-E

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249007181

VL - 12

SP - 21

EP - 43

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

IS - 1

ER -