Sexual decision making for the better than average college student

Lindsey L. Ross, Anne Markey Bowen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the impact of downward social comparison and the known partner is a safe partner heuristic on college students' sexual decisions. Participants: One hundred-eighty heterosexual or bisexual undergraduate college students. Methods: Participants read dating vignettes that varied on perspective and familiarity and then rated the likelihood the couple would engage in sexual intercourse and use a condom. Results: There were no differences in rated likelihood based on familiarity, suggesting that the students did not view the 2 partner types as significantly different. Students rated the likelihood of sexual intercourse lower and condom use higher when the vignette was presented from the second person perspective. Conclusions: The students' use of downward social comparison is consistent with the better than average effect, suggesting that the students perceive their own behavior as safe. The implication is that safer sex messages might be most effective if they focus on what students will gain by practicing safer sex behaviors, not just avoidance of a risk behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-216
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of American College Health
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Students
Safe Sex
Coitus
Condoms
Heterosexuality
Risk-Taking
Sexual Behavior

Keywords

  • experimental design
  • health education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sexual decision making for the better than average college student. / Ross, Lindsey L.; Bowen, Anne Markey.

In: Journal of American College Health, Vol. 59, No. 3, 11.2011, p. 211-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39074ebeb31f4cea8b548740768900f2,
title = "Sexual decision making for the better than average college student",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the impact of downward social comparison and the known partner is a safe partner heuristic on college students' sexual decisions. Participants: One hundred-eighty heterosexual or bisexual undergraduate college students. Methods: Participants read dating vignettes that varied on perspective and familiarity and then rated the likelihood the couple would engage in sexual intercourse and use a condom. Results: There were no differences in rated likelihood based on familiarity, suggesting that the students did not view the 2 partner types as significantly different. Students rated the likelihood of sexual intercourse lower and condom use higher when the vignette was presented from the second person perspective. Conclusions: The students' use of downward social comparison is consistent with the better than average effect, suggesting that the students perceive their own behavior as safe. The implication is that safer sex messages might be most effective if they focus on what students will gain by practicing safer sex behaviors, not just avoidance of a risk behavior.",
keywords = "experimental design, health education",
author = "Ross, {Lindsey L.} and Bowen, {Anne Markey}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/07448481.2010.502198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "211--216",
journal = "Journal of American College Health",
issn = "0744-8481",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual decision making for the better than average college student

AU - Ross, Lindsey L.

AU - Bowen, Anne Markey

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objectives: To examine the impact of downward social comparison and the known partner is a safe partner heuristic on college students' sexual decisions. Participants: One hundred-eighty heterosexual or bisexual undergraduate college students. Methods: Participants read dating vignettes that varied on perspective and familiarity and then rated the likelihood the couple would engage in sexual intercourse and use a condom. Results: There were no differences in rated likelihood based on familiarity, suggesting that the students did not view the 2 partner types as significantly different. Students rated the likelihood of sexual intercourse lower and condom use higher when the vignette was presented from the second person perspective. Conclusions: The students' use of downward social comparison is consistent with the better than average effect, suggesting that the students perceive their own behavior as safe. The implication is that safer sex messages might be most effective if they focus on what students will gain by practicing safer sex behaviors, not just avoidance of a risk behavior.

AB - Objectives: To examine the impact of downward social comparison and the known partner is a safe partner heuristic on college students' sexual decisions. Participants: One hundred-eighty heterosexual or bisexual undergraduate college students. Methods: Participants read dating vignettes that varied on perspective and familiarity and then rated the likelihood the couple would engage in sexual intercourse and use a condom. Results: There were no differences in rated likelihood based on familiarity, suggesting that the students did not view the 2 partner types as significantly different. Students rated the likelihood of sexual intercourse lower and condom use higher when the vignette was presented from the second person perspective. Conclusions: The students' use of downward social comparison is consistent with the better than average effect, suggesting that the students perceive their own behavior as safe. The implication is that safer sex messages might be most effective if they focus on what students will gain by practicing safer sex behaviors, not just avoidance of a risk behavior.

KW - experimental design

KW - health education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649867446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649867446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2010.502198

DO - 10.1080/07448481.2010.502198

M3 - Article

C2 - 21186452

AN - SCOPUS:78649867446

VL - 59

SP - 211

EP - 216

JO - Journal of American College Health

JF - Journal of American College Health

SN - 0744-8481

IS - 3

ER -