Sexual References and Consequences for Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Characters on Television: A Comparison Content Analysis

Bradley James Bond, Brandon Miller, Jennifer L Stevens Aubrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalMass Communication and Society
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 12 2018

Fingerprint

Television
television
content analysis
Lead
joke
sexuality
gender-specific factors
dialogue
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{17f8f9557b0549328d2a4ee87eabf95b,
title = "Sexual References and Consequences for Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Characters on Television: A Comparison Content Analysis",
abstract = "A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.",
author = "Bond, {Bradley James} and Brandon Miller and {Stevens Aubrey}, {Jennifer L}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/15205436.2018.1489058",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Mass Communication and Society",
issn = "1520-5436",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual References and Consequences for Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Characters on Television

T2 - A Comparison Content Analysis

AU - Bond, Bradley James

AU - Miller, Brandon

AU - Stevens Aubrey, Jennifer L

PY - 2018/7/12

Y1 - 2018/7/12

N2 - A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.

AB - A content analysis was conducted to examine sexual references and consequences among lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and heterosexual characters on television. The sample was composed of programs portraying an LGB lead or reoccurring character. Results showed that heterosexual and LGB characters engaged in sexual talk and behavior in similar contexts. When discussing LGB sexualities, however, heterosexual characters were disproportionately likely to make jokes; LGB characters were disproportionately likely to discuss coming out. LGB characters depicted in sexual references were more likely to be in dialogue with a heterosexual character than another LGB character. Sexual consequences were more common for heterosexual characters than LGB characters. No gender differences existed in frequency of sexual references or consequences among LGB characters, evidence that the sexual double standard found in previous research may not apply to LGB characters. Results are discussed in terms of potential effects of exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049783885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049783885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15205436.2018.1489058

DO - 10.1080/15205436.2018.1489058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049783885

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Mass Communication and Society

JF - Mass Communication and Society

SN - 1520-5436

ER -