Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

P. Marek, Achintya Haldar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages222-227
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)0769519970, 9780769519975
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Event4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003 - College Park, United States
Duration: Sep 21 2003Sep 24 2003

Other

Other4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003
CountryUnited States
CityCollege Park
Period9/21/039/24/03

Fingerprint

Engineering Design
Alternatives
Simulation
Engineers
Recommendations
Design
Engineering design
Engineering
Education
Students
Evaluate
Estimate
Resistance
Concepts
Factors

Keywords

  • Civil engineering
  • Computational modeling
  • Design engineering
  • Engineering profession
  • Guidelines
  • Power engineering and energy
  • Power engineering computing
  • Process design
  • Reliability engineering
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Control and Optimization
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Marek, P., & Haldar, A. (2003). Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. In 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003 (pp. 222-227). [1236166] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. / Marek, P.; Haldar, Achintya.

4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2003. p. 222-227 1236166.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Marek, P & Haldar, A 2003, Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. in 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003., 1236166, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 222-227, 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003, College Park, United States, 9/21/03. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166
Marek P, Haldar A. Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. In 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2003. p. 222-227. 1236166 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166
Marek, P. ; Haldar, Achintya. / Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2003. pp. 222-227
@inproceedings{f4ae9e5fa781457da6d642b6570555fa,
title = "Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design",
abstract = "The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.",
keywords = "Civil engineering, Computational modeling, Design engineering, Engineering profession, Guidelines, Power engineering and energy, Power engineering computing, Process design, Reliability engineering, Uncertainty",
author = "P. Marek and Achintya Haldar",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0769519970",
pages = "222--227",
booktitle = "4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

AU - Marek, P.

AU - Haldar, Achintya

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

AB - The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

KW - Civil engineering

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Design engineering

KW - Engineering profession

KW - Guidelines

KW - Power engineering and energy

KW - Power engineering computing

KW - Process design

KW - Reliability engineering

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944811081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944811081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

DO - 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84944811081

SN - 0769519970

SN - 9780769519975

SP - 222

EP - 227

BT - 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -