Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

P. Marek; Achintya Haldar

doi:10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

P. Marek, Achintya Haldar

Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	222-227
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Print)	0769519970, 9780769519975
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166
State	Published - 2003
Event	4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003 - College Park, United States Duration: Sep 21 2003 → Sep 24 2003

Other

Other	4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003
Country	United States
City	College Park
Period	9/21/03 → 9/24/03

Keywords

Civil engineering
Computational modeling
Design engineering
Engineering profession
Guidelines
Power engineering and energy
Power engineering computing
Process design
Reliability engineering
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Control and Optimization
Modeling and Simulation

Access to Document

10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Marek, P & Haldar, A 2003, Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design. in 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003., 1236166, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 222-227, 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003, College Park, United States, 9/21/03. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

@inproceedings{f4ae9e5fa781457da6d642b6570555fa,

title = "Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design",

abstract = "The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.",

keywords = "Civil engineering, Computational modeling, Design engineering, Engineering profession, Guidelines, Power engineering and energy, Power engineering computing, Process design, Reliability engineering, Uncertainty",

author = "P. Marek and Achintya Haldar",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "0769519970",

pages = "222--227",

booktitle = "4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

note = "4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003 ; Conference date: 21-09-2003 Through 24-09-2003",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

AU - Marek, P.

AU - Haldar, Achintya

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

AB - The engineering profession has accepted the risk-based design in the form of Load and Resistance Factors design (LRFD) concept. However, a large number of practicing engineers do not use it in everyday design. Lack of education may be a reason for this avoidance. Another major complaint is that the current LRFD-based codified approach cannot estimate the reliability of real structures. Simulation could be an attractive alternative considering the recent significant improvement in computational power. However, the question remains whether the simulation-based design concept is mature enough to be considered as an alternative to the currently available codified approach. An international community of scholars, scientists, practicing engineers, and students met in a colloquium in the summer of 2002 in Prague, Czech Republic, to evaluate the role of simulation in engineering design. Their comments, observations, and recommendations are summarized here to help generate more interest on the subject.

KW - Civil engineering

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Design engineering

KW - Engineering profession

KW - Guidelines

KW - Power engineering and energy

KW - Power engineering computing

KW - Process design

KW - Reliability engineering

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944811081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944811081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

DO - 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236166

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84944811081

SN - 0769519970

SN - 9780769519975

SP - 222

EP - 227

BT - 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003

Y2 - 21 September 2003 through 24 September 2003

ER -

Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design

Abstract

Other

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this