Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: A review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

527 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews theoretical and statistical considerations for validation of several methods currently used in the determination and analysis of skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness. The theoretical relation of skinfolds and density to body fatness are each examined with technical and biological sources of variation in both methods explored and quantified. An estimate of variability in body density due to variation in fat-free body composition within specific populations is .006 gm/cc causing errors in estimated percent fat of 2.7%. Body water and mineral content contribute most to the variability in the fat-free body density. Skinfolds predict body density with standard errors of estimate close to that expected (.0098 gm/cc) due to biological and technical sources. The pooled standard error of estimate from 23 samples of subjects ranging from children to middle-age adults, but excluding young male adult samples, is .0091 gm/cc; for young adult males that pooled standard error of estimate is significantly less, .0070 gm/cc (12 samples). Biological factors associated with age and sex appear to be the main factors limiting generalized regression equations between skinfolds and density. Further standardization of the skinfold method is needed to determine if there are additional biological factors limiting predictability of density from skinfold equations within populations of the same sex and age. To facilitate the development of generalized regression equations for prediction of body density from skinfolds, several general principles of cross-validation studies are listed and illustrated. The validation of curvilinear equations for prediction of density in adult subjects over a wide age range appears promising, but must wait further standardization in measurement technique and selection of skinfold sites, random sampling in various populations and the calculation of several sample statistics (R, SEE, E, mean difference, and standard deviation of predicted density values) for each cross-validation study. Also, to facilitate future cross validation of skinfold equations several equations are given which offer promise of being generalized across various populations within males and females.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-225
Number of pages45
JournalHuman Biology
Volume53
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Fats
Biological Factors
Population
Young Adult
Body Water
fat
Body Composition
Minerals
standardization
limiting factor
sampling
lipids
prediction
gender
methodology
young adults
body water
body composition
mineral content

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness : A review. / Lohman, Timothy G.

In: Human Biology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1981, p. 181-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f847da7fe8c248cc832b7d1b1653baba,
title = "Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: A review",
abstract = "This paper reviews theoretical and statistical considerations for validation of several methods currently used in the determination and analysis of skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness. The theoretical relation of skinfolds and density to body fatness are each examined with technical and biological sources of variation in both methods explored and quantified. An estimate of variability in body density due to variation in fat-free body composition within specific populations is .006 gm/cc causing errors in estimated percent fat of 2.7{\%}. Body water and mineral content contribute most to the variability in the fat-free body density. Skinfolds predict body density with standard errors of estimate close to that expected (.0098 gm/cc) due to biological and technical sources. The pooled standard error of estimate from 23 samples of subjects ranging from children to middle-age adults, but excluding young male adult samples, is .0091 gm/cc; for young adult males that pooled standard error of estimate is significantly less, .0070 gm/cc (12 samples). Biological factors associated with age and sex appear to be the main factors limiting generalized regression equations between skinfolds and density. Further standardization of the skinfold method is needed to determine if there are additional biological factors limiting predictability of density from skinfold equations within populations of the same sex and age. To facilitate the development of generalized regression equations for prediction of body density from skinfolds, several general principles of cross-validation studies are listed and illustrated. The validation of curvilinear equations for prediction of density in adult subjects over a wide age range appears promising, but must wait further standardization in measurement technique and selection of skinfold sites, random sampling in various populations and the calculation of several sample statistics (R, SEE, E, mean difference, and standard deviation of predicted density values) for each cross-validation study. Also, to facilitate future cross validation of skinfold equations several equations are given which offer promise of being generalized across various populations within males and females.",
author = "Lohman, {Timothy G}",
year = "1981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "181--225",
journal = "Human Biology",
issn = "0018-7143",
publisher = "Wayne State University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness

T2 - A review

AU - Lohman, Timothy G

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - This paper reviews theoretical and statistical considerations for validation of several methods currently used in the determination and analysis of skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness. The theoretical relation of skinfolds and density to body fatness are each examined with technical and biological sources of variation in both methods explored and quantified. An estimate of variability in body density due to variation in fat-free body composition within specific populations is .006 gm/cc causing errors in estimated percent fat of 2.7%. Body water and mineral content contribute most to the variability in the fat-free body density. Skinfolds predict body density with standard errors of estimate close to that expected (.0098 gm/cc) due to biological and technical sources. The pooled standard error of estimate from 23 samples of subjects ranging from children to middle-age adults, but excluding young male adult samples, is .0091 gm/cc; for young adult males that pooled standard error of estimate is significantly less, .0070 gm/cc (12 samples). Biological factors associated with age and sex appear to be the main factors limiting generalized regression equations between skinfolds and density. Further standardization of the skinfold method is needed to determine if there are additional biological factors limiting predictability of density from skinfold equations within populations of the same sex and age. To facilitate the development of generalized regression equations for prediction of body density from skinfolds, several general principles of cross-validation studies are listed and illustrated. The validation of curvilinear equations for prediction of density in adult subjects over a wide age range appears promising, but must wait further standardization in measurement technique and selection of skinfold sites, random sampling in various populations and the calculation of several sample statistics (R, SEE, E, mean difference, and standard deviation of predicted density values) for each cross-validation study. Also, to facilitate future cross validation of skinfold equations several equations are given which offer promise of being generalized across various populations within males and females.

AB - This paper reviews theoretical and statistical considerations for validation of several methods currently used in the determination and analysis of skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness. The theoretical relation of skinfolds and density to body fatness are each examined with technical and biological sources of variation in both methods explored and quantified. An estimate of variability in body density due to variation in fat-free body composition within specific populations is .006 gm/cc causing errors in estimated percent fat of 2.7%. Body water and mineral content contribute most to the variability in the fat-free body density. Skinfolds predict body density with standard errors of estimate close to that expected (.0098 gm/cc) due to biological and technical sources. The pooled standard error of estimate from 23 samples of subjects ranging from children to middle-age adults, but excluding young male adult samples, is .0091 gm/cc; for young adult males that pooled standard error of estimate is significantly less, .0070 gm/cc (12 samples). Biological factors associated with age and sex appear to be the main factors limiting generalized regression equations between skinfolds and density. Further standardization of the skinfold method is needed to determine if there are additional biological factors limiting predictability of density from skinfold equations within populations of the same sex and age. To facilitate the development of generalized regression equations for prediction of body density from skinfolds, several general principles of cross-validation studies are listed and illustrated. The validation of curvilinear equations for prediction of density in adult subjects over a wide age range appears promising, but must wait further standardization in measurement technique and selection of skinfold sites, random sampling in various populations and the calculation of several sample statistics (R, SEE, E, mean difference, and standard deviation of predicted density values) for each cross-validation study. Also, to facilitate future cross validation of skinfold equations several equations are given which offer promise of being generalized across various populations within males and females.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019440342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019440342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7239496

AN - SCOPUS:0019440342

VL - 53

SP - 181

EP - 225

JO - Human Biology

JF - Human Biology

SN - 0018-7143

IS - 2

ER -