Sleight of hand: Identifying concealed information by monitoring mouse-cursor movements

Jeffrey L. Jenkins, Jeffrey G. Proudfoot, Joseph S Valacich, G. Mark Grimes, Jay F Nunamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Organizational members who conceal information about adverse behaviors present a substantial risk to that organization. Yet the task of identifying who is concealing information is extremely difficult, expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. We propose a unique methodology for identifying concealed information: measuring people’s mouse-cursor movements in online screening questionnaires. We theoretically explain how mouse-cursor movements captured during a screening questionnaire differ between people concealing information and truth tellers. We empirically evaluate our hypotheses using an experiment during which people conceal information about a questionable act. While people completed the screening questionnaire, we simultaneously collected mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity-the primary sensor used for polygraph examinations-as an additional validation of our methodology. We found that mouse-cursor movements can significantly differentiate between people concealing information and people telling the truth. Mouse-cursor movements can also differentiate between people concealing information and truth tellers on a broader set of comparisons relative to electrodermal activity. Both mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity have the potential to identify concealed information, yet mouse-cursor movements yielded significantly fewer false positives. Our results demonstrate that analyzing mouse-cursor movements has promise for identifying concealed information. This methodology can be automated and deployed online for mass screening of individuals in a natural setting without the need for human facilitators. Our approach further demonstrates that mouse-cursor movements can provide insight into the cognitive state of computer users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of the Association of Information Systems
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Screening
Monitoring
Sensors
Experiments

Keywords

  • Concealed information
  • Deception detection
  • Electrodermal activity
  • Graded-motor response analysis
  • Mouse-cursor movement
  • Video Emotion Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Sleight of hand : Identifying concealed information by monitoring mouse-cursor movements. / Jenkins, Jeffrey L.; Proudfoot, Jeffrey G.; Valacich, Joseph S; Grimes, G. Mark; Nunamaker, Jay F.

In: Journal of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 1-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f059fc53fe4e41bc828078f6983ae611,
title = "Sleight of hand: Identifying concealed information by monitoring mouse-cursor movements",
abstract = "Organizational members who conceal information about adverse behaviors present a substantial risk to that organization. Yet the task of identifying who is concealing information is extremely difficult, expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. We propose a unique methodology for identifying concealed information: measuring people’s mouse-cursor movements in online screening questionnaires. We theoretically explain how mouse-cursor movements captured during a screening questionnaire differ between people concealing information and truth tellers. We empirically evaluate our hypotheses using an experiment during which people conceal information about a questionable act. While people completed the screening questionnaire, we simultaneously collected mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity-the primary sensor used for polygraph examinations-as an additional validation of our methodology. We found that mouse-cursor movements can significantly differentiate between people concealing information and people telling the truth. Mouse-cursor movements can also differentiate between people concealing information and truth tellers on a broader set of comparisons relative to electrodermal activity. Both mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity have the potential to identify concealed information, yet mouse-cursor movements yielded significantly fewer false positives. Our results demonstrate that analyzing mouse-cursor movements has promise for identifying concealed information. This methodology can be automated and deployed online for mass screening of individuals in a natural setting without the need for human facilitators. Our approach further demonstrates that mouse-cursor movements can provide insight into the cognitive state of computer users.",
keywords = "Concealed information, Deception detection, Electrodermal activity, Graded-motor response analysis, Mouse-cursor movement, Video Emotion Analysis",
author = "Jenkins, {Jeffrey L.} and Proudfoot, {Jeffrey G.} and Valacich, {Joseph S} and Grimes, {G. Mark} and Nunamaker, {Jay F}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17705/1jais.00527",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--32",
journal = "Journal of the Association of Information Systems",
issn = "1536-9323",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sleight of hand

T2 - Identifying concealed information by monitoring mouse-cursor movements

AU - Jenkins, Jeffrey L.

AU - Proudfoot, Jeffrey G.

AU - Valacich, Joseph S

AU - Grimes, G. Mark

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Organizational members who conceal information about adverse behaviors present a substantial risk to that organization. Yet the task of identifying who is concealing information is extremely difficult, expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. We propose a unique methodology for identifying concealed information: measuring people’s mouse-cursor movements in online screening questionnaires. We theoretically explain how mouse-cursor movements captured during a screening questionnaire differ between people concealing information and truth tellers. We empirically evaluate our hypotheses using an experiment during which people conceal information about a questionable act. While people completed the screening questionnaire, we simultaneously collected mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity-the primary sensor used for polygraph examinations-as an additional validation of our methodology. We found that mouse-cursor movements can significantly differentiate between people concealing information and people telling the truth. Mouse-cursor movements can also differentiate between people concealing information and truth tellers on a broader set of comparisons relative to electrodermal activity. Both mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity have the potential to identify concealed information, yet mouse-cursor movements yielded significantly fewer false positives. Our results demonstrate that analyzing mouse-cursor movements has promise for identifying concealed information. This methodology can be automated and deployed online for mass screening of individuals in a natural setting without the need for human facilitators. Our approach further demonstrates that mouse-cursor movements can provide insight into the cognitive state of computer users.

AB - Organizational members who conceal information about adverse behaviors present a substantial risk to that organization. Yet the task of identifying who is concealing information is extremely difficult, expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. We propose a unique methodology for identifying concealed information: measuring people’s mouse-cursor movements in online screening questionnaires. We theoretically explain how mouse-cursor movements captured during a screening questionnaire differ between people concealing information and truth tellers. We empirically evaluate our hypotheses using an experiment during which people conceal information about a questionable act. While people completed the screening questionnaire, we simultaneously collected mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity-the primary sensor used for polygraph examinations-as an additional validation of our methodology. We found that mouse-cursor movements can significantly differentiate between people concealing information and people telling the truth. Mouse-cursor movements can also differentiate between people concealing information and truth tellers on a broader set of comparisons relative to electrodermal activity. Both mouse-cursor movements and electrodermal activity have the potential to identify concealed information, yet mouse-cursor movements yielded significantly fewer false positives. Our results demonstrate that analyzing mouse-cursor movements has promise for identifying concealed information. This methodology can be automated and deployed online for mass screening of individuals in a natural setting without the need for human facilitators. Our approach further demonstrates that mouse-cursor movements can provide insight into the cognitive state of computer users.

KW - Concealed information

KW - Deception detection

KW - Electrodermal activity

KW - Graded-motor response analysis

KW - Mouse-cursor movement

KW - Video Emotion Analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067981595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067981595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17705/1jais.00527

DO - 10.17705/1jais.00527

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067981595

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 32

JO - Journal of the Association of Information Systems

JF - Journal of the Association of Information Systems

SN - 1536-9323

IS - 1

ER -