Smearing the opposition: Implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. presidential candidates and the current U.S. President

Spee Kosloff, Jeff L Greenberg, Toni Schmader, Mark Dechesne, David Weise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1-3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-398
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume139
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Stereotyping
Islam

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Implicit and explicit
  • Intergroup bias
  • Politics
  • Smear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Smearing the opposition : Implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. presidential candidates and the current U.S. President. / Kosloff, Spee; Greenberg, Jeff L; Schmader, Toni; Dechesne, Mark; Weise, David.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 139, No. 3, 08.2010, p. 383-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f39f7962d3c4cf09e0c1744def9de9f,
title = "Smearing the opposition: Implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. presidential candidates and the current U.S. President",
abstract = "Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1-3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.",
keywords = "Categorization, Implicit and explicit, Intergroup bias, Politics, Smear",
author = "Spee Kosloff and Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Toni Schmader and Mark Dechesne and David Weise",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/a0018809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "383--398",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smearing the opposition

T2 - Implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. presidential candidates and the current U.S. President

AU - Kosloff, Spee

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Schmader, Toni

AU - Dechesne, Mark

AU - Weise, David

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1-3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.

AB - Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1-3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.

KW - Categorization

KW - Implicit and explicit

KW - Intergroup bias

KW - Politics

KW - Smear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955765576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955765576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018809

DO - 10.1037/a0018809

M3 - Article

C2 - 20677891

AN - SCOPUS:77955765576

VL - 139

SP - 383

EP - 398

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -