SN 2006gy: Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae

Nathan Smith, W. Li, Ryan J. Foley, J. Craig Wheeler, David Pooley, Ryan Chornock, Alexei V. Filippenko, Jeffrey M. Silverman, Robert Quimby, Joshua S. Bloom, Charles Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

370 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the discovery and early observations of the peculiar Type IIn supernova (SN) 2006gy in NGC 1260. With a peak visual magnitude of about -22, it is the most luminous supernova ever recorded. Its very slow rise to maximum took ∼70 days, and it stayed brighter than -21 mag for about 100 days. It is not yet clear what powers the enormous luminosity and the total radiated energy of ∼1051 erg, but we argue that any known mechanism - thermal emission, circumstellar interaction, or 56Ni decay - requires a very massive progenitor star. The circumstellar interaction hypothesis would require truly exceptional conditions around the star, which, in the decades before its death, must have experienced a luminous blue variable (LBV) eruption like the 19th century eruption of η Carinae. However, this scenario fails to explain the weak and unabsorbed soft X-rays detected by Chandra. Radioactive decay of 56Ni may be a less objectionable hypothesis, but it would imply a large Ni mass of ∼22 M, requiring SN 2006gy to have been a pair-instability supernova where the star's core was obliterated. While this is still uncertain, SN 2006gy is the first supernova for which we have good reason to suspect a pair-instability explosion. Based on a number of lines of evidence, we eliminate the hypothesis that SN 2006gy was a "Type IIa" event, that is, a white dwarf exploding inside a hydrogen envelope. Instead, we propose that the progenitor was a very massive evolved object like η Carinae that, contrary to expectations, failed to shed its hydrogen envelope. SN 2006gy implies that some of the most massive stars can explode prematurely during the LBV phase, never becoming Wolf-Rayet stars. SN 2006gy also suggests that they can create brilliant supemovae instead of experiencing ignominious deaths through direct collapse to a black hole. If such a fate is common among the most massive stars, then observable supernovae from Population III stars in the early universe will be more numerous than previously believed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1116-1128
Number of pages13
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume666
Issue number2 I
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

massive stars
death
supernovae
volcanic eruption
hydrogen
radioactive decay
erg
explosion
energy
volcanic eruptions
envelopes
Population III stars
stars
Wolf-Rayet stars
thermal emission
explosions
universe
luminosity
interactions
decay

Keywords

  • Circumstellar matter
  • Stars: evolution
  • Supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

SN 2006gy : Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae. / Smith, Nathan; Li, W.; Foley, Ryan J.; Wheeler, J. Craig; Pooley, David; Chornock, Ryan; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Silverman, Jeffrey M.; Quimby, Robert; Bloom, Joshua S.; Hansen, Charles.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 666, No. 2 I, 2007, p. 1116-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, N, Li, W, Foley, RJ, Wheeler, JC, Pooley, D, Chornock, R, Filippenko, AV, Silverman, JM, Quimby, R, Bloom, JS & Hansen, C 2007, 'SN 2006gy: Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 666, no. 2 I, pp. 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1086/519949
Smith, Nathan ; Li, W. ; Foley, Ryan J. ; Wheeler, J. Craig ; Pooley, David ; Chornock, Ryan ; Filippenko, Alexei V. ; Silverman, Jeffrey M. ; Quimby, Robert ; Bloom, Joshua S. ; Hansen, Charles. / SN 2006gy : Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 666, No. 2 I. pp. 1116-1128.
@article{81f49c083fbe4666833f21e3ee43fa10,
title = "SN 2006gy: Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae",
abstract = "We report the discovery and early observations of the peculiar Type IIn supernova (SN) 2006gy in NGC 1260. With a peak visual magnitude of about -22, it is the most luminous supernova ever recorded. Its very slow rise to maximum took ∼70 days, and it stayed brighter than -21 mag for about 100 days. It is not yet clear what powers the enormous luminosity and the total radiated energy of ∼1051 erg, but we argue that any known mechanism - thermal emission, circumstellar interaction, or 56Ni decay - requires a very massive progenitor star. The circumstellar interaction hypothesis would require truly exceptional conditions around the star, which, in the decades before its death, must have experienced a luminous blue variable (LBV) eruption like the 19th century eruption of η Carinae. However, this scenario fails to explain the weak and unabsorbed soft X-rays detected by Chandra. Radioactive decay of 56Ni may be a less objectionable hypothesis, but it would imply a large Ni mass of ∼22 M⊙, requiring SN 2006gy to have been a pair-instability supernova where the star's core was obliterated. While this is still uncertain, SN 2006gy is the first supernova for which we have good reason to suspect a pair-instability explosion. Based on a number of lines of evidence, we eliminate the hypothesis that SN 2006gy was a {"}Type IIa{"} event, that is, a white dwarf exploding inside a hydrogen envelope. Instead, we propose that the progenitor was a very massive evolved object like η Carinae that, contrary to expectations, failed to shed its hydrogen envelope. SN 2006gy implies that some of the most massive stars can explode prematurely during the LBV phase, never becoming Wolf-Rayet stars. SN 2006gy also suggests that they can create brilliant supemovae instead of experiencing ignominious deaths through direct collapse to a black hole. If such a fate is common among the most massive stars, then observable supernovae from Population III stars in the early universe will be more numerous than previously believed.",
keywords = "Circumstellar matter, Stars: evolution, Supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)",
author = "Nathan Smith and W. Li and Foley, {Ryan J.} and Wheeler, {J. Craig} and David Pooley and Ryan Chornock and Filippenko, {Alexei V.} and Silverman, {Jeffrey M.} and Robert Quimby and Bloom, {Joshua S.} and Charles Hansen",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1086/519949",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "666",
pages = "1116--1128",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SN 2006gy

T2 - Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae

AU - Smith, Nathan

AU - Li, W.

AU - Foley, Ryan J.

AU - Wheeler, J. Craig

AU - Pooley, David

AU - Chornock, Ryan

AU - Filippenko, Alexei V.

AU - Silverman, Jeffrey M.

AU - Quimby, Robert

AU - Bloom, Joshua S.

AU - Hansen, Charles

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - We report the discovery and early observations of the peculiar Type IIn supernova (SN) 2006gy in NGC 1260. With a peak visual magnitude of about -22, it is the most luminous supernova ever recorded. Its very slow rise to maximum took ∼70 days, and it stayed brighter than -21 mag for about 100 days. It is not yet clear what powers the enormous luminosity and the total radiated energy of ∼1051 erg, but we argue that any known mechanism - thermal emission, circumstellar interaction, or 56Ni decay - requires a very massive progenitor star. The circumstellar interaction hypothesis would require truly exceptional conditions around the star, which, in the decades before its death, must have experienced a luminous blue variable (LBV) eruption like the 19th century eruption of η Carinae. However, this scenario fails to explain the weak and unabsorbed soft X-rays detected by Chandra. Radioactive decay of 56Ni may be a less objectionable hypothesis, but it would imply a large Ni mass of ∼22 M⊙, requiring SN 2006gy to have been a pair-instability supernova where the star's core was obliterated. While this is still uncertain, SN 2006gy is the first supernova for which we have good reason to suspect a pair-instability explosion. Based on a number of lines of evidence, we eliminate the hypothesis that SN 2006gy was a "Type IIa" event, that is, a white dwarf exploding inside a hydrogen envelope. Instead, we propose that the progenitor was a very massive evolved object like η Carinae that, contrary to expectations, failed to shed its hydrogen envelope. SN 2006gy implies that some of the most massive stars can explode prematurely during the LBV phase, never becoming Wolf-Rayet stars. SN 2006gy also suggests that they can create brilliant supemovae instead of experiencing ignominious deaths through direct collapse to a black hole. If such a fate is common among the most massive stars, then observable supernovae from Population III stars in the early universe will be more numerous than previously believed.

AB - We report the discovery and early observations of the peculiar Type IIn supernova (SN) 2006gy in NGC 1260. With a peak visual magnitude of about -22, it is the most luminous supernova ever recorded. Its very slow rise to maximum took ∼70 days, and it stayed brighter than -21 mag for about 100 days. It is not yet clear what powers the enormous luminosity and the total radiated energy of ∼1051 erg, but we argue that any known mechanism - thermal emission, circumstellar interaction, or 56Ni decay - requires a very massive progenitor star. The circumstellar interaction hypothesis would require truly exceptional conditions around the star, which, in the decades before its death, must have experienced a luminous blue variable (LBV) eruption like the 19th century eruption of η Carinae. However, this scenario fails to explain the weak and unabsorbed soft X-rays detected by Chandra. Radioactive decay of 56Ni may be a less objectionable hypothesis, but it would imply a large Ni mass of ∼22 M⊙, requiring SN 2006gy to have been a pair-instability supernova where the star's core was obliterated. While this is still uncertain, SN 2006gy is the first supernova for which we have good reason to suspect a pair-instability explosion. Based on a number of lines of evidence, we eliminate the hypothesis that SN 2006gy was a "Type IIa" event, that is, a white dwarf exploding inside a hydrogen envelope. Instead, we propose that the progenitor was a very massive evolved object like η Carinae that, contrary to expectations, failed to shed its hydrogen envelope. SN 2006gy implies that some of the most massive stars can explode prematurely during the LBV phase, never becoming Wolf-Rayet stars. SN 2006gy also suggests that they can create brilliant supemovae instead of experiencing ignominious deaths through direct collapse to a black hole. If such a fate is common among the most massive stars, then observable supernovae from Population III stars in the early universe will be more numerous than previously believed.

KW - Circumstellar matter

KW - Stars: evolution

KW - Supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348898472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348898472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/519949

DO - 10.1086/519949

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:35348898472

VL - 666

SP - 1116

EP - 1128

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2 I

ER -