Social baseline theory: The social regulation of risk and effort

James A. Coan, David A Sbarra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe Social Baseline Theory (SBT), a perspective that integrates the study of social relationships with principles of attachment, behavioral ecology, cognitive neuroscience, and perception science. SBT suggests the human brain expects access to social relationships that mitigate risk and diminish the level of effort needed to meet a variety of goals. This is accomplished in part by incorporating relational partners into neural representations of the self. By contrast, decreased access to relational partners increases cognitive and physiological effort. Relationship disruptions entail re-defining the self as independent, which implies greater risk, increased effort, and diminished well being. The ungrafting of the self and other may mediate recovery from relationship loss.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-91
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Ego
Ecology
Brain
Social Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Social baseline theory : The social regulation of risk and effort. / Coan, James A.; Sbarra, David A.

In: Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 87-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d047058b34744556a6f55fdcefd98ce3,
title = "Social baseline theory: The social regulation of risk and effort",
abstract = "We describe Social Baseline Theory (SBT), a perspective that integrates the study of social relationships with principles of attachment, behavioral ecology, cognitive neuroscience, and perception science. SBT suggests the human brain expects access to social relationships that mitigate risk and diminish the level of effort needed to meet a variety of goals. This is accomplished in part by incorporating relational partners into neural representations of the self. By contrast, decreased access to relational partners increases cognitive and physiological effort. Relationship disruptions entail re-defining the self as independent, which implies greater risk, increased effort, and diminished well being. The ungrafting of the self and other may mediate recovery from relationship loss.",
author = "Coan, {James A.} and Sbarra, {David A}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "87--91",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",
issn = "2352-250X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social baseline theory

T2 - The social regulation of risk and effort

AU - Coan, James A.

AU - Sbarra, David A

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - We describe Social Baseline Theory (SBT), a perspective that integrates the study of social relationships with principles of attachment, behavioral ecology, cognitive neuroscience, and perception science. SBT suggests the human brain expects access to social relationships that mitigate risk and diminish the level of effort needed to meet a variety of goals. This is accomplished in part by incorporating relational partners into neural representations of the self. By contrast, decreased access to relational partners increases cognitive and physiological effort. Relationship disruptions entail re-defining the self as independent, which implies greater risk, increased effort, and diminished well being. The ungrafting of the self and other may mediate recovery from relationship loss.

AB - We describe Social Baseline Theory (SBT), a perspective that integrates the study of social relationships with principles of attachment, behavioral ecology, cognitive neuroscience, and perception science. SBT suggests the human brain expects access to social relationships that mitigate risk and diminish the level of effort needed to meet a variety of goals. This is accomplished in part by incorporating relational partners into neural representations of the self. By contrast, decreased access to relational partners increases cognitive and physiological effort. Relationship disruptions entail re-defining the self as independent, which implies greater risk, increased effort, and diminished well being. The ungrafting of the self and other may mediate recovery from relationship loss.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923253527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923253527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923253527

VL - 1

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

SN - 2352-250X

ER -