Social biases modulate the loss of redundant forms in the cultural evolution of language

Gareth Roberts, Maryia Fedzechkina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the competitive exclusion principle (Gause, 1934), competition for the same niche must eventually lead one competitor to extinction or the occupation of a new niche. This principle applies in both biology and the cultural evolution of language, where different words and structures compete for the same function or meaning (Aronoff, 2016). Across languages, for example, word order trades off with case marking as a means of indicating who did what to whom in a sentence. Previous experimental work has shed light on how such trade-offs come about as languages adapt to human biases through learning and production, with biases becoming amplified through iterated learning over generations. At the same time, a large body of work has documented the impact of social biases on language change. However, little work has investigated how social biases interact with learning and production biases. In particular, the social dimension of language may provide alternative niches for otherwise redundant forms, preventing or slowing their extinction. We tested this hypothesis in an iterated-learning experiment in which participants were exposed to a language with two dialects, both of which had fixed word order, but differed in whether they employed case markers. In one condition, we biased participants socially towards speakers of the dialect that employed case; in other conditions we provided no bias, or biased participants for or against the dialect without case. As expected under our hypothesis, the use of case markers declined over time in all conditions, but the social bias in favor of case-dialect speakers slowed the decline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-201
Number of pages8
JournalCognition
Volume171
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Cultural Evolution
Language
dialect
trend
language
Learning
learning
Social Conditions
language change
Occupations
Evolution of Language
biology
occupation
exclusion
experiment

Keywords

  • Artificial language learning
  • Cultural evolution
  • Iterated language learning
  • Language change
  • Learning biases
  • Social biases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Social biases modulate the loss of redundant forms in the cultural evolution of language. / Roberts, Gareth; Fedzechkina, Maryia.

In: Cognition, Vol. 171, 02.2018, p. 194-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1531f56f08f84434a944fa57cee67787,
title = "Social biases modulate the loss of redundant forms in the cultural evolution of language",
abstract = "According to the competitive exclusion principle (Gause, 1934), competition for the same niche must eventually lead one competitor to extinction or the occupation of a new niche. This principle applies in both biology and the cultural evolution of language, where different words and structures compete for the same function or meaning (Aronoff, 2016). Across languages, for example, word order trades off with case marking as a means of indicating who did what to whom in a sentence. Previous experimental work has shed light on how such trade-offs come about as languages adapt to human biases through learning and production, with biases becoming amplified through iterated learning over generations. At the same time, a large body of work has documented the impact of social biases on language change. However, little work has investigated how social biases interact with learning and production biases. In particular, the social dimension of language may provide alternative niches for otherwise redundant forms, preventing or slowing their extinction. We tested this hypothesis in an iterated-learning experiment in which participants were exposed to a language with two dialects, both of which had fixed word order, but differed in whether they employed case markers. In one condition, we biased participants socially towards speakers of the dialect that employed case; in other conditions we provided no bias, or biased participants for or against the dialect without case. As expected under our hypothesis, the use of case markers declined over time in all conditions, but the social bias in favor of case-dialect speakers slowed the decline.",
keywords = "Artificial language learning, Cultural evolution, Iterated language learning, Language change, Learning biases, Social biases",
author = "Gareth Roberts and Maryia Fedzechkina",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "194--201",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social biases modulate the loss of redundant forms in the cultural evolution of language

AU - Roberts, Gareth

AU - Fedzechkina, Maryia

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - According to the competitive exclusion principle (Gause, 1934), competition for the same niche must eventually lead one competitor to extinction or the occupation of a new niche. This principle applies in both biology and the cultural evolution of language, where different words and structures compete for the same function or meaning (Aronoff, 2016). Across languages, for example, word order trades off with case marking as a means of indicating who did what to whom in a sentence. Previous experimental work has shed light on how such trade-offs come about as languages adapt to human biases through learning and production, with biases becoming amplified through iterated learning over generations. At the same time, a large body of work has documented the impact of social biases on language change. However, little work has investigated how social biases interact with learning and production biases. In particular, the social dimension of language may provide alternative niches for otherwise redundant forms, preventing or slowing their extinction. We tested this hypothesis in an iterated-learning experiment in which participants were exposed to a language with two dialects, both of which had fixed word order, but differed in whether they employed case markers. In one condition, we biased participants socially towards speakers of the dialect that employed case; in other conditions we provided no bias, or biased participants for or against the dialect without case. As expected under our hypothesis, the use of case markers declined over time in all conditions, but the social bias in favor of case-dialect speakers slowed the decline.

AB - According to the competitive exclusion principle (Gause, 1934), competition for the same niche must eventually lead one competitor to extinction or the occupation of a new niche. This principle applies in both biology and the cultural evolution of language, where different words and structures compete for the same function or meaning (Aronoff, 2016). Across languages, for example, word order trades off with case marking as a means of indicating who did what to whom in a sentence. Previous experimental work has shed light on how such trade-offs come about as languages adapt to human biases through learning and production, with biases becoming amplified through iterated learning over generations. At the same time, a large body of work has documented the impact of social biases on language change. However, little work has investigated how social biases interact with learning and production biases. In particular, the social dimension of language may provide alternative niches for otherwise redundant forms, preventing or slowing their extinction. We tested this hypothesis in an iterated-learning experiment in which participants were exposed to a language with two dialects, both of which had fixed word order, but differed in whether they employed case markers. In one condition, we biased participants socially towards speakers of the dialect that employed case; in other conditions we provided no bias, or biased participants for or against the dialect without case. As expected under our hypothesis, the use of case markers declined over time in all conditions, but the social bias in favor of case-dialect speakers slowed the decline.

KW - Artificial language learning

KW - Cultural evolution

KW - Iterated language learning

KW - Language change

KW - Learning biases

KW - Social biases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034992337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034992337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 29182959

AN - SCOPUS:85034992337

VL - 171

SP - 194

EP - 201

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -