Social desirability bias in the 2016 Presidential Election

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Partisanship is a stable trait but expressions of partisan preferences can vary according to social context. When particular preferences become socially undesirable, some individuals refrain from expressing them in public, even in relatively anonymous settings such as surveys and polls. In this study, we rely on the psychological trait of self-monitoring to show that Americans who are more likely to adjust their behaviors to comply with social norms (i.e. high self-monitors) were less likely to express support for Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential Election. In turn, as self-monitoring decreases, we find that the tendency to express support for Trump increases. This study suggests that - at least for some individuals - there may have been a tendency in 2016 to repress expressed support for Donald Trump in order to mask socially undesirable attitudes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-443
Number of pages11
JournalForum (Germany)
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

social desirability
presidential election
monitoring
Social Norms
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Social desirability bias in the 2016 Presidential Election. / Klar, Samara M; Weber, Christopher; Krupnikov, Yanna.

In: Forum (Germany), Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 433-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{aa15c921479540d2b539d4e77ca426a5,
title = "Social desirability bias in the 2016 Presidential Election",
abstract = "Partisanship is a stable trait but expressions of partisan preferences can vary according to social context. When particular preferences become socially undesirable, some individuals refrain from expressing them in public, even in relatively anonymous settings such as surveys and polls. In this study, we rely on the psychological trait of self-monitoring to show that Americans who are more likely to adjust their behaviors to comply with social norms (i.e. high self-monitors) were less likely to express support for Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential Election. In turn, as self-monitoring decreases, we find that the tendency to express support for Trump increases. This study suggests that - at least for some individuals - there may have been a tendency in 2016 to repress expressed support for Donald Trump in order to mask socially undesirable attitudes.",
author = "Klar, {Samara M} and Christopher Weber and Yanna Krupnikov",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/for-2016-0037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "433--443",
journal = "Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics",
issn = "1540-8884",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social desirability bias in the 2016 Presidential Election

AU - Klar, Samara M

AU - Weber, Christopher

AU - Krupnikov, Yanna

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Partisanship is a stable trait but expressions of partisan preferences can vary according to social context. When particular preferences become socially undesirable, some individuals refrain from expressing them in public, even in relatively anonymous settings such as surveys and polls. In this study, we rely on the psychological trait of self-monitoring to show that Americans who are more likely to adjust their behaviors to comply with social norms (i.e. high self-monitors) were less likely to express support for Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential Election. In turn, as self-monitoring decreases, we find that the tendency to express support for Trump increases. This study suggests that - at least for some individuals - there may have been a tendency in 2016 to repress expressed support for Donald Trump in order to mask socially undesirable attitudes.

AB - Partisanship is a stable trait but expressions of partisan preferences can vary according to social context. When particular preferences become socially undesirable, some individuals refrain from expressing them in public, even in relatively anonymous settings such as surveys and polls. In this study, we rely on the psychological trait of self-monitoring to show that Americans who are more likely to adjust their behaviors to comply with social norms (i.e. high self-monitors) were less likely to express support for Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential Election. In turn, as self-monitoring decreases, we find that the tendency to express support for Trump increases. This study suggests that - at least for some individuals - there may have been a tendency in 2016 to repress expressed support for Donald Trump in order to mask socially undesirable attitudes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014275706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014275706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/for-2016-0037

DO - 10.1515/for-2016-0037

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85014275706

VL - 14

SP - 433

EP - 443

JO - Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

JF - Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

SN - 1540-8884

IS - 4

ER -