Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines themes and concerns about my book, The Order of Public Reason, raised in the three essays in this symposium by Peter Boettke & Rosolino Candela, Michael Munger and Kevin Vallier. The three essays present variations on a common theme: I need to embrace deeper commitments than The Order of Public Reason acknowledges. In my estimation these proposals lead to places that I do not wish to go — nor should anyone devoted to core Hayekian insights. The goal of the book is show how a diversity of moral views can lead to a cooperative social morality while abjuring as far as possible “external” moral claims — claims that do not derive from the perspectives of cooperating individuals. The diverse individual moral perspectives, and what they understand as normative, must be the real engines of social normativity. In this essay I stress the primacy of the individual normative perspectives in generating social morality; this helps show why the urge to embrace deeper commitments should be resisted. Rather than going over the presentation in The Order of Public Reason to stress this point, I sketch a modest recasting of the analysis in terms of models of individual moral interaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Austrian Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 9 2016

Fingerprint

Primacy
Morality
Interaction
Symposium
F.A. Hayek
Normativity

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Justification
  • Morality
  • Public reason
  • Rules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives. / Gaus, Gerald F.

In: Review of Austrian Economics, 09.08.2016, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36e2b40bd93a49b1a2484604fe57ed9f,
title = "Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives",
abstract = "This paper examines themes and concerns about my book, The Order of Public Reason, raised in the three essays in this symposium by Peter Boettke & Rosolino Candela, Michael Munger and Kevin Vallier. The three essays present variations on a common theme: I need to embrace deeper commitments than The Order of Public Reason acknowledges. In my estimation these proposals lead to places that I do not wish to go — nor should anyone devoted to core Hayekian insights. The goal of the book is show how a diversity of moral views can lead to a cooperative social morality while abjuring as far as possible “external” moral claims — claims that do not derive from the perspectives of cooperating individuals. The diverse individual moral perspectives, and what they understand as normative, must be the real engines of social normativity. In this essay I stress the primacy of the individual normative perspectives in generating social morality; this helps show why the urge to embrace deeper commitments should be resisted. Rather than going over the presentation in The Order of Public Reason to stress this point, I sketch a modest recasting of the analysis in terms of models of individual moral interaction.",
keywords = "Coordination, Justification, Morality, Public reason, Rules",
author = "Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11138-016-0358-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Review of Austrian Economics",
issn = "0889-3047",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2016/8/9

Y1 - 2016/8/9

N2 - This paper examines themes and concerns about my book, The Order of Public Reason, raised in the three essays in this symposium by Peter Boettke & Rosolino Candela, Michael Munger and Kevin Vallier. The three essays present variations on a common theme: I need to embrace deeper commitments than The Order of Public Reason acknowledges. In my estimation these proposals lead to places that I do not wish to go — nor should anyone devoted to core Hayekian insights. The goal of the book is show how a diversity of moral views can lead to a cooperative social morality while abjuring as far as possible “external” moral claims — claims that do not derive from the perspectives of cooperating individuals. The diverse individual moral perspectives, and what they understand as normative, must be the real engines of social normativity. In this essay I stress the primacy of the individual normative perspectives in generating social morality; this helps show why the urge to embrace deeper commitments should be resisted. Rather than going over the presentation in The Order of Public Reason to stress this point, I sketch a modest recasting of the analysis in terms of models of individual moral interaction.

AB - This paper examines themes and concerns about my book, The Order of Public Reason, raised in the three essays in this symposium by Peter Boettke & Rosolino Candela, Michael Munger and Kevin Vallier. The three essays present variations on a common theme: I need to embrace deeper commitments than The Order of Public Reason acknowledges. In my estimation these proposals lead to places that I do not wish to go — nor should anyone devoted to core Hayekian insights. The goal of the book is show how a diversity of moral views can lead to a cooperative social morality while abjuring as far as possible “external” moral claims — claims that do not derive from the perspectives of cooperating individuals. The diverse individual moral perspectives, and what they understand as normative, must be the real engines of social normativity. In this essay I stress the primacy of the individual normative perspectives in generating social morality; this helps show why the urge to embrace deeper commitments should be resisted. Rather than going over the presentation in The Order of Public Reason to stress this point, I sketch a modest recasting of the analysis in terms of models of individual moral interaction.

KW - Coordination

KW - Justification

KW - Morality

KW - Public reason

KW - Rules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981165048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981165048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11138-016-0358-8

DO - 10.1007/s11138-016-0358-8

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Review of Austrian Economics

JF - Review of Austrian Economics

SN - 0889-3047

ER -