Social network analysis in archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) in archaeology has become important for a range of theoretical and methodological approaches that can more generally be characterized as relational. They are relational in that it is the ties between actors (or nodes) that define social connections. Archaeologists are currently employing a diversity of theoretical approaches to networks, and the perspective taken in this review is that SNA can provide insights into a number of different social processes using different theories. Following a brief historical overview, I discuss two aspects of SNA: The structural position of the actor or node, and characterizations of whole networks. I then summarize several broad classes of archaeological networks: Historical, spatial, and material. I conclude with a call for more bridging approaches to span alternative theoretical and methodological approaches in the archaeology of networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-397
Number of pages19
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2017

Fingerprint

network analysis
archaeology
social network
social process
Social Network Analysis
Archaeology

Keywords

  • archaeological networks
  • complexity
  • relational archaeology
  • social network analysis
  • spatial analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Social network analysis in archaeology. / Mills, Barbara J.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 46, 23.10.2017, p. 379-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{fd96efd6684c472daefbbae12fb9a2ea,
title = "Social network analysis in archaeology",
abstract = "Social network analysis (SNA) in archaeology has become important for a range of theoretical and methodological approaches that can more generally be characterized as relational. They are relational in that it is the ties between actors (or nodes) that define social connections. Archaeologists are currently employing a diversity of theoretical approaches to networks, and the perspective taken in this review is that SNA can provide insights into a number of different social processes using different theories. Following a brief historical overview, I discuss two aspects of SNA: The structural position of the actor or node, and characterizations of whole networks. I then summarize several broad classes of archaeological networks: Historical, spatial, and material. I conclude with a call for more bridging approaches to span alternative theoretical and methodological approaches in the archaeology of networks.",
keywords = "archaeological networks, complexity, relational archaeology, social network analysis, spatial analysis",
author = "Mills, {Barbara J}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "379--397",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social network analysis in archaeology

AU - Mills, Barbara J

PY - 2017/10/23

Y1 - 2017/10/23

N2 - Social network analysis (SNA) in archaeology has become important for a range of theoretical and methodological approaches that can more generally be characterized as relational. They are relational in that it is the ties between actors (or nodes) that define social connections. Archaeologists are currently employing a diversity of theoretical approaches to networks, and the perspective taken in this review is that SNA can provide insights into a number of different social processes using different theories. Following a brief historical overview, I discuss two aspects of SNA: The structural position of the actor or node, and characterizations of whole networks. I then summarize several broad classes of archaeological networks: Historical, spatial, and material. I conclude with a call for more bridging approaches to span alternative theoretical and methodological approaches in the archaeology of networks.

AB - Social network analysis (SNA) in archaeology has become important for a range of theoretical and methodological approaches that can more generally be characterized as relational. They are relational in that it is the ties between actors (or nodes) that define social connections. Archaeologists are currently employing a diversity of theoretical approaches to networks, and the perspective taken in this review is that SNA can provide insights into a number of different social processes using different theories. Following a brief historical overview, I discuss two aspects of SNA: The structural position of the actor or node, and characterizations of whole networks. I then summarize several broad classes of archaeological networks: Historical, spatial, and material. I conclude with a call for more bridging approaches to span alternative theoretical and methodological approaches in the archaeology of networks.

KW - archaeological networks

KW - complexity

KW - relational archaeology

KW - social network analysis

KW - spatial analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032226988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032226988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423

DO - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 379

EP - 397

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

ER -