Social Psychological Theory as History: Outlining the Critical-Historical Approach to Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The mainstream epistemology of social psychology is markedly ahistorical, prioritizing the quantification of processes assumed to be lawful and generalizable. Social psychologists often consider theory to be either a practical tool for summarizing what is known about a problem area and making predictions or a torch that illuminates the counterintuitive causal force underlying a variety of disparate phenomena. I propose a third vision of critical-historical theory. From this perspective, theories should be committed to deep interdisciplinarity and historical validity claims—understanding individual and group experiences as part of historically contingent forces. Theories also should be critical, containing an awareness of the researcher as implicated in the social process and committed to actively improving society. To demonstrate its viability, I review classic works from the history of the discipline that exemplify critical-historical theory and offer concrete implications for theorists interested in employing this approach in their own work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychological Theory
Social Psychology
History
Research Personnel
Psychology
Social Theory

Keywords

  • critical psychology
  • critical theory
  • epistemology
  • history
  • neoliberalism
  • theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{24c8fef0d9de49159d2ee27f07c5eaff,
title = "Social Psychological Theory as History: Outlining the Critical-Historical Approach to Theory",
abstract = "The mainstream epistemology of social psychology is markedly ahistorical, prioritizing the quantification of processes assumed to be lawful and generalizable. Social psychologists often consider theory to be either a practical tool for summarizing what is known about a problem area and making predictions or a torch that illuminates the counterintuitive causal force underlying a variety of disparate phenomena. I propose a third vision of critical-historical theory. From this perspective, theories should be committed to deep interdisciplinarity and historical validity claims—understanding individual and group experiences as part of historically contingent forces. Theories also should be critical, containing an awareness of the researcher as implicated in the social process and committed to actively improving society. To demonstrate its viability, I review classic works from the history of the discipline that exemplify critical-historical theory and offer concrete implications for theorists interested in employing this approach in their own work.",
keywords = "critical psychology, critical theory, epistemology, history, neoliberalism, theory",
author = "Daniel Sullivan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1088868319883174",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Psychological Theory as History

T2 - Outlining the Critical-Historical Approach to Theory

AU - Sullivan, Daniel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The mainstream epistemology of social psychology is markedly ahistorical, prioritizing the quantification of processes assumed to be lawful and generalizable. Social psychologists often consider theory to be either a practical tool for summarizing what is known about a problem area and making predictions or a torch that illuminates the counterintuitive causal force underlying a variety of disparate phenomena. I propose a third vision of critical-historical theory. From this perspective, theories should be committed to deep interdisciplinarity and historical validity claims—understanding individual and group experiences as part of historically contingent forces. Theories also should be critical, containing an awareness of the researcher as implicated in the social process and committed to actively improving society. To demonstrate its viability, I review classic works from the history of the discipline that exemplify critical-historical theory and offer concrete implications for theorists interested in employing this approach in their own work.

AB - The mainstream epistemology of social psychology is markedly ahistorical, prioritizing the quantification of processes assumed to be lawful and generalizable. Social psychologists often consider theory to be either a practical tool for summarizing what is known about a problem area and making predictions or a torch that illuminates the counterintuitive causal force underlying a variety of disparate phenomena. I propose a third vision of critical-historical theory. From this perspective, theories should be committed to deep interdisciplinarity and historical validity claims—understanding individual and group experiences as part of historically contingent forces. Theories also should be critical, containing an awareness of the researcher as implicated in the social process and committed to actively improving society. To demonstrate its viability, I review classic works from the history of the discipline that exemplify critical-historical theory and offer concrete implications for theorists interested in employing this approach in their own work.

KW - critical psychology

KW - critical theory

KW - epistemology

KW - history

KW - neoliberalism

KW - theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074586478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074586478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1088868319883174

DO - 10.1177/1088868319883174

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074586478

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

ER -