Socioeconomic considerations of road impact fees

Arthur Christian Nelson, Thomas W. Sanchez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unsophisticated applications of road development impact fees have adverse socioeconomic impacts. This occurs when road impact fees are not calibrated to account for variation in household commuting trip lengths by household income proxied by house size in square meters, or when such fees do not account for the variation in work trip generation rates by house location with respect to transit station distance. The purpose of this study is to indicate in what ways unsophisticated fees have adverse socioeconomic effects and pose reasonably straightforward ways in which to correct for those effects. Failure to make these adjustments could lead to inequitable and inefficient road impact fee programs that may result in more fiscal harm than good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-35
Number of pages4
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1498
StatePublished - Jul 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economic and social effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Socioeconomic considerations of road impact fees. / Nelson, Arthur Christian; Sanchez, Thomas W.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1498, 07.1995, p. 32-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fbd2f0529024e5cb6de08ee1ef87cee,
title = "Socioeconomic considerations of road impact fees",
abstract = "Unsophisticated applications of road development impact fees have adverse socioeconomic impacts. This occurs when road impact fees are not calibrated to account for variation in household commuting trip lengths by household income proxied by house size in square meters, or when such fees do not account for the variation in work trip generation rates by house location with respect to transit station distance. The purpose of this study is to indicate in what ways unsophisticated fees have adverse socioeconomic effects and pose reasonably straightforward ways in which to correct for those effects. Failure to make these adjustments could lead to inequitable and inefficient road impact fee programs that may result in more fiscal harm than good.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian} and Sanchez, {Thomas W.}",
year = "1995",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "32--35",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1498",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic considerations of road impact fees

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

AU - Sanchez, Thomas W.

PY - 1995/7

Y1 - 1995/7

N2 - Unsophisticated applications of road development impact fees have adverse socioeconomic impacts. This occurs when road impact fees are not calibrated to account for variation in household commuting trip lengths by household income proxied by house size in square meters, or when such fees do not account for the variation in work trip generation rates by house location with respect to transit station distance. The purpose of this study is to indicate in what ways unsophisticated fees have adverse socioeconomic effects and pose reasonably straightforward ways in which to correct for those effects. Failure to make these adjustments could lead to inequitable and inefficient road impact fee programs that may result in more fiscal harm than good.

AB - Unsophisticated applications of road development impact fees have adverse socioeconomic impacts. This occurs when road impact fees are not calibrated to account for variation in household commuting trip lengths by household income proxied by house size in square meters, or when such fees do not account for the variation in work trip generation rates by house location with respect to transit station distance. The purpose of this study is to indicate in what ways unsophisticated fees have adverse socioeconomic effects and pose reasonably straightforward ways in which to correct for those effects. Failure to make these adjustments could lead to inequitable and inefficient road impact fee programs that may result in more fiscal harm than good.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029333339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029333339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 32

EP - 35

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1498

ER -