Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives

Oliver Schilke, Karen S. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on the sources of organizational trustworthiness remains bifurcated. Some scholars have adopted a calculative perspective, stressing the primacy of actors' rational calculations, while others have approached trustworthiness from a relational perspective, focusing on its social underpinnings. We help to reconcile these seemingly disparate views by adopting an integrative approach that allows us to clarify the boundaries of both perspectives. Based on dyadic survey data from 171 strategic alliances, we find that the calculative perspective (represented by contractual safeguards) has higher predictive power when the partner lacks a favorable reputation. In contrast, the relational perspective (represented by organizational culture) predicts trustworthiness more strongly when familiarity with the partner organization is high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-297
Number of pages22
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alliances
Trustworthiness
Primacy
Organizational culture
Safeguards
Predictive power
Survey data
Strategic alliances
Familiarity

Keywords

  • Alliances
  • Contracts
  • Interorganizational relationships
  • Organizational culture
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness : Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. / Schilke, Oliver; Cook, Karen S.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 276-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{283c12ea7f8f48e6b9d8663e12255221,
title = "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives",
abstract = "Research on the sources of organizational trustworthiness remains bifurcated. Some scholars have adopted a calculative perspective, stressing the primacy of actors' rational calculations, while others have approached trustworthiness from a relational perspective, focusing on its social underpinnings. We help to reconcile these seemingly disparate views by adopting an integrative approach that allows us to clarify the boundaries of both perspectives. Based on dyadic survey data from 171 strategic alliances, we find that the calculative perspective (represented by contractual safeguards) has higher predictive power when the partner lacks a favorable reputation. In contrast, the relational perspective (represented by organizational culture) predicts trustworthiness more strongly when familiarity with the partner organization is high.",
keywords = "Alliances, Contracts, Interorganizational relationships, Organizational culture, Trust",
author = "Oliver Schilke and Cook, {Karen S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "276--297",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness

T2 - Integrating calculative and relational perspectives

AU - Schilke, Oliver

AU - Cook, Karen S.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Research on the sources of organizational trustworthiness remains bifurcated. Some scholars have adopted a calculative perspective, stressing the primacy of actors' rational calculations, while others have approached trustworthiness from a relational perspective, focusing on its social underpinnings. We help to reconcile these seemingly disparate views by adopting an integrative approach that allows us to clarify the boundaries of both perspectives. Based on dyadic survey data from 171 strategic alliances, we find that the calculative perspective (represented by contractual safeguards) has higher predictive power when the partner lacks a favorable reputation. In contrast, the relational perspective (represented by organizational culture) predicts trustworthiness more strongly when familiarity with the partner organization is high.

AB - Research on the sources of organizational trustworthiness remains bifurcated. Some scholars have adopted a calculative perspective, stressing the primacy of actors' rational calculations, while others have approached trustworthiness from a relational perspective, focusing on its social underpinnings. We help to reconcile these seemingly disparate views by adopting an integrative approach that allows us to clarify the boundaries of both perspectives. Based on dyadic survey data from 171 strategic alliances, we find that the calculative perspective (represented by contractual safeguards) has higher predictive power when the partner lacks a favorable reputation. In contrast, the relational perspective (represented by organizational culture) predicts trustworthiness more strongly when familiarity with the partner organization is high.

KW - Alliances

KW - Contracts

KW - Interorganizational relationships

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920875240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920875240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2208

DO - 10.1002/smj.2208

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920875240

VL - 36

SP - 276

EP - 297

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 2

ER -