Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

J. Kao, J. Turian, A. Meyers, Russell J Hamilton, B. Smith, S. Vijayakumar, Ashesh B. Jani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7% vs 67.2%, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95% of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4% vs 21.9%, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume77
Issue number914
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Prostate
Rectum
Urinary Bladder
Radiation
Penis
Erectile Dysfunction
Quality of Life
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. / Kao, J.; Turian, J.; Meyers, A.; Hamilton, Russell J; Smith, B.; Vijayakumar, S.; Jani, Ashesh B.

In: British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 77, No. 914, 02.2004, p. 129-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kao, J. ; Turian, J. ; Meyers, A. ; Hamilton, Russell J ; Smith, B. ; Vijayakumar, S. ; Jani, Ashesh B. / Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. In: British Journal of Radiology. 2004 ; Vol. 77, No. 914. pp. 129-136.
@article{b18723900db348b894806aa827b51dd3,
title = "Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7{\%} vs 67.2{\%}, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95{\%} of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4{\%} vs 21.9{\%}, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.",
author = "J. Kao and J. Turian and A. Meyers and Hamilton, {Russell J} and B. Smith and S. Vijayakumar and Jani, {Ashesh B.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1259/bjr/37893924",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "129--136",
journal = "British Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "914",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

AU - Kao, J.

AU - Turian, J.

AU - Meyers, A.

AU - Hamilton, Russell J

AU - Smith, B.

AU - Vijayakumar, S.

AU - Jani, Ashesh B.

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7% vs 67.2%, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95% of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4% vs 21.9%, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.

AB - Quality of life is an important consideration in the treatment of early prostate cancer. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that higher radiation doses delivered to the bulb of penis and proximal penile structures correlates with higher rates of post-radiation impotence. The goal of this investigation was to determine if intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spares dose to the penile bulb while maintaining coverage of the prostate. 10 consecutive patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer were planned with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or IMRT to give a dose of 74 Gy without specifically constraining the plans to spare the penile bulb. All 10 patients were ultimately treated with IMRT. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and the doses to prostate, rectum, bladder and penile bulb were compared. IMRT reduced the mean penile bulb doses compared with 3D-CRT (33.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy, p<0.001), the percentage of penile bulb receiving over 40 Gy (37.7% vs 67.2%, p<0.001) and the dose received by >95% of penile bulb (5.3 Gy vs 11.7 Gy, p=0.003). Maximum penile bulb doses were higher with IMRT (81.2 Gy vs 73.1 Gy, p<0.001) although the volume of this high dose region was small. Both methods resulted in similar coverage of the prostate. The volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT (18.4% vs 21.9%, p=0.003) but the volumes of bladder receiving 70 Gy were similar (p=0.3). IMRT may potentially reduce long term sexual morbidity by reducing the dose to the majority of the penile bulb.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542299570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542299570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/bjr/37893924

DO - 10.1259/bjr/37893924

M3 - Article

C2 - 15010385

AN - SCOPUS:1542299570

VL - 77

SP - 129

EP - 136

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

IS - 914

ER -