Spatial Aspects of Food Webs

Ulrich Brose, Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman, Anna Eklöf, Janne Bengtsson, Matty P. Berg, Steven H. Cousins, Christian Mulder, Herman A. Verhoef, Volkmar Wolters

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial distributions of trophic interactions define the spatial heterogeneity of food webs and differences between local and macroecological food webs. The concept of co-occurrence has to be given up when larger spatial scales are considered that integrate different local community food webs into a metacommunity food web. This chapter provides two examples. First, some large-bodied predators are too low in numerical abundance to invade all local community food webs simultaneously. Second, not all potential resource species in a metacommunity can persist under strong top-down pressure by their consumer species and thus avoid coexistence in the same local communities. Food webs consist of organisms that vary in their taxonomic identity, body size, trophic interactions, and trophic position and thus might have very different spatial scales of interactions. Recognition of the importance of spatial scale in food web studies has several implications for food web theory. In particular, the potential food webs that are frequently described by ecologists will often differ from how food webs are realized in actual space and time. Clearly, choosing the right spatio-temporal scale for a food web study depends on the species studied and the study objective. Integrating spatial processes such as extinction and colonization by dispersal in food web models is an important step towards understanding population dynamics in complex communities, and understanding the consequences of habitat loss for the community structure and food web dynamics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDynamic Food Webs
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages463-469
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9780120884582
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Food Chain
food webs
Population Dynamics
Body Size
ecologists
habitat destruction
space and time
Ecosystem
community structure
extinction
population dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Brose, U., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., Eklöf, A., Bengtsson, J., Berg, M. P., Cousins, S. H., ... Wolters, V. (2006). Spatial Aspects of Food Webs. In Dynamic Food Webs (pp. 463-469). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6

Spatial Aspects of Food Webs. / Brose, Ulrich; Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell; Eklöf, Anna; Bengtsson, Janne; Berg, Matty P.; Cousins, Steven H.; Mulder, Christian; Verhoef, Herman A.; Wolters, Volkmar.

Dynamic Food Webs. Elsevier Inc., 2006. p. 463-469.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Brose, U, Pavao-Zuckerman, M, Eklöf, A, Bengtsson, J, Berg, MP, Cousins, SH, Mulder, C, Verhoef, HA & Wolters, V 2006, Spatial Aspects of Food Webs. in Dynamic Food Webs. Elsevier Inc., pp. 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6
Brose U, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Eklöf A, Bengtsson J, Berg MP, Cousins SH et al. Spatial Aspects of Food Webs. In Dynamic Food Webs. Elsevier Inc. 2006. p. 463-469 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6
Brose, Ulrich ; Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell ; Eklöf, Anna ; Bengtsson, Janne ; Berg, Matty P. ; Cousins, Steven H. ; Mulder, Christian ; Verhoef, Herman A. ; Wolters, Volkmar. / Spatial Aspects of Food Webs. Dynamic Food Webs. Elsevier Inc., 2006. pp. 463-469
@inbook{8cb0dac462b24f76bd9e4de038ea47ea,
title = "Spatial Aspects of Food Webs",
abstract = "Spatial distributions of trophic interactions define the spatial heterogeneity of food webs and differences between local and macroecological food webs. The concept of co-occurrence has to be given up when larger spatial scales are considered that integrate different local community food webs into a metacommunity food web. This chapter provides two examples. First, some large-bodied predators are too low in numerical abundance to invade all local community food webs simultaneously. Second, not all potential resource species in a metacommunity can persist under strong top-down pressure by their consumer species and thus avoid coexistence in the same local communities. Food webs consist of organisms that vary in their taxonomic identity, body size, trophic interactions, and trophic position and thus might have very different spatial scales of interactions. Recognition of the importance of spatial scale in food web studies has several implications for food web theory. In particular, the potential food webs that are frequently described by ecologists will often differ from how food webs are realized in actual space and time. Clearly, choosing the right spatio-temporal scale for a food web study depends on the species studied and the study objective. Integrating spatial processes such as extinction and colonization by dispersal in food web models is an important step towards understanding population dynamics in complex communities, and understanding the consequences of habitat loss for the community structure and food web dynamics.",
author = "Ulrich Brose and Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman and Anna Ekl{\"o}f and Janne Bengtsson and Berg, {Matty P.} and Cousins, {Steven H.} and Christian Mulder and Verhoef, {Herman A.} and Volkmar Wolters",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780120884582",
pages = "463--469",
booktitle = "Dynamic Food Webs",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Spatial Aspects of Food Webs

AU - Brose, Ulrich

AU - Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell

AU - Eklöf, Anna

AU - Bengtsson, Janne

AU - Berg, Matty P.

AU - Cousins, Steven H.

AU - Mulder, Christian

AU - Verhoef, Herman A.

AU - Wolters, Volkmar

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Spatial distributions of trophic interactions define the spatial heterogeneity of food webs and differences between local and macroecological food webs. The concept of co-occurrence has to be given up when larger spatial scales are considered that integrate different local community food webs into a metacommunity food web. This chapter provides two examples. First, some large-bodied predators are too low in numerical abundance to invade all local community food webs simultaneously. Second, not all potential resource species in a metacommunity can persist under strong top-down pressure by their consumer species and thus avoid coexistence in the same local communities. Food webs consist of organisms that vary in their taxonomic identity, body size, trophic interactions, and trophic position and thus might have very different spatial scales of interactions. Recognition of the importance of spatial scale in food web studies has several implications for food web theory. In particular, the potential food webs that are frequently described by ecologists will often differ from how food webs are realized in actual space and time. Clearly, choosing the right spatio-temporal scale for a food web study depends on the species studied and the study objective. Integrating spatial processes such as extinction and colonization by dispersal in food web models is an important step towards understanding population dynamics in complex communities, and understanding the consequences of habitat loss for the community structure and food web dynamics.

AB - Spatial distributions of trophic interactions define the spatial heterogeneity of food webs and differences between local and macroecological food webs. The concept of co-occurrence has to be given up when larger spatial scales are considered that integrate different local community food webs into a metacommunity food web. This chapter provides two examples. First, some large-bodied predators are too low in numerical abundance to invade all local community food webs simultaneously. Second, not all potential resource species in a metacommunity can persist under strong top-down pressure by their consumer species and thus avoid coexistence in the same local communities. Food webs consist of organisms that vary in their taxonomic identity, body size, trophic interactions, and trophic position and thus might have very different spatial scales of interactions. Recognition of the importance of spatial scale in food web studies has several implications for food web theory. In particular, the potential food webs that are frequently described by ecologists will often differ from how food webs are realized in actual space and time. Clearly, choosing the right spatio-temporal scale for a food web study depends on the species studied and the study objective. Integrating spatial processes such as extinction and colonization by dispersal in food web models is an important step towards understanding population dynamics in complex communities, and understanding the consequences of habitat loss for the community structure and food web dynamics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870547963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870547963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6

DO - 10.1016/B978-012088458-2/50043-6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84870547963

SN - 9780120884582

SP - 463

EP - 469

BT - Dynamic Food Webs

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -