Spatial scale and place field stability in a grid-to-place cell model of the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus

David Lyttle, Brian Gereke, Kevin Lin, Jean-Marc Fellous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rodent hippocampus and entorhinal cortex contain spatially modulated cells that serve as the basis for spatial coding. Both medial entorhinal grid cells and hippocampal place cells have been shown to encode spatial information across multiple spatial scales that increase along the dorsoventral axis of these structures. Place cells near the dorsal pole possess small, stable, and spatially selective firing fields, while ventral cells have larger, less stable, and less spatially selective firing fields. One possible explanation for these dorsoventral changes in place field properties is that they arise as a result of similar dorsoventral differences in the properties of the grid cell inputs to place cells. Here, we test the alternative hypothesis that dorsoventral place field differences are due to higher amounts of nonspatial inputs to ventral hippocampal cells. We use a computational model of the entorhinal-hippocampal network to assess the relative contributions of grid scale and nonspatial inputs in determining place field size and stability. In addition, we assess the consequences of grid node firing rate heterogeneity on place field stability. Our results suggest that dorsoventral differences in place cell properties can be better explained by changes in the amount of nonspatial inputs, rather than by changes in the scale of grid cell inputs, and that grid node heterogeneity may have important functional consequences. The observed gradient in field size may reflect a shift from processing primarily spatial information in the dorsal hippocampus to processing more nonspatial, contextual, and emotional information near the ventral hippocampus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-744
Number of pages16
JournalHippocampus
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Hippocampus
Entorhinal Cortex
Rodentia
Place Cells
Grid Cells

Keywords

  • Computational model
  • Dorsoventral
  • Grid cells
  • Hippocampus
  • Place cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Spatial scale and place field stability in a grid-to-place cell model of the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus. / Lyttle, David; Gereke, Brian; Lin, Kevin; Fellous, Jean-Marc.

In: Hippocampus, Vol. 23, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 729-744.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad712024941d419d930c27a575d08d10,
title = "Spatial scale and place field stability in a grid-to-place cell model of the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus",
abstract = "The rodent hippocampus and entorhinal cortex contain spatially modulated cells that serve as the basis for spatial coding. Both medial entorhinal grid cells and hippocampal place cells have been shown to encode spatial information across multiple spatial scales that increase along the dorsoventral axis of these structures. Place cells near the dorsal pole possess small, stable, and spatially selective firing fields, while ventral cells have larger, less stable, and less spatially selective firing fields. One possible explanation for these dorsoventral changes in place field properties is that they arise as a result of similar dorsoventral differences in the properties of the grid cell inputs to place cells. Here, we test the alternative hypothesis that dorsoventral place field differences are due to higher amounts of nonspatial inputs to ventral hippocampal cells. We use a computational model of the entorhinal-hippocampal network to assess the relative contributions of grid scale and nonspatial inputs in determining place field size and stability. In addition, we assess the consequences of grid node firing rate heterogeneity on place field stability. Our results suggest that dorsoventral differences in place cell properties can be better explained by changes in the amount of nonspatial inputs, rather than by changes in the scale of grid cell inputs, and that grid node heterogeneity may have important functional consequences. The observed gradient in field size may reflect a shift from processing primarily spatial information in the dorsal hippocampus to processing more nonspatial, contextual, and emotional information near the ventral hippocampus.",
keywords = "Computational model, Dorsoventral, Grid cells, Hippocampus, Place cells",
author = "David Lyttle and Brian Gereke and Kevin Lin and Jean-Marc Fellous",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/hipo.22132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "729--744",
journal = "Hippocampus",
issn = "1050-9631",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial scale and place field stability in a grid-to-place cell model of the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus

AU - Lyttle, David

AU - Gereke, Brian

AU - Lin, Kevin

AU - Fellous, Jean-Marc

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The rodent hippocampus and entorhinal cortex contain spatially modulated cells that serve as the basis for spatial coding. Both medial entorhinal grid cells and hippocampal place cells have been shown to encode spatial information across multiple spatial scales that increase along the dorsoventral axis of these structures. Place cells near the dorsal pole possess small, stable, and spatially selective firing fields, while ventral cells have larger, less stable, and less spatially selective firing fields. One possible explanation for these dorsoventral changes in place field properties is that they arise as a result of similar dorsoventral differences in the properties of the grid cell inputs to place cells. Here, we test the alternative hypothesis that dorsoventral place field differences are due to higher amounts of nonspatial inputs to ventral hippocampal cells. We use a computational model of the entorhinal-hippocampal network to assess the relative contributions of grid scale and nonspatial inputs in determining place field size and stability. In addition, we assess the consequences of grid node firing rate heterogeneity on place field stability. Our results suggest that dorsoventral differences in place cell properties can be better explained by changes in the amount of nonspatial inputs, rather than by changes in the scale of grid cell inputs, and that grid node heterogeneity may have important functional consequences. The observed gradient in field size may reflect a shift from processing primarily spatial information in the dorsal hippocampus to processing more nonspatial, contextual, and emotional information near the ventral hippocampus.

AB - The rodent hippocampus and entorhinal cortex contain spatially modulated cells that serve as the basis for spatial coding. Both medial entorhinal grid cells and hippocampal place cells have been shown to encode spatial information across multiple spatial scales that increase along the dorsoventral axis of these structures. Place cells near the dorsal pole possess small, stable, and spatially selective firing fields, while ventral cells have larger, less stable, and less spatially selective firing fields. One possible explanation for these dorsoventral changes in place field properties is that they arise as a result of similar dorsoventral differences in the properties of the grid cell inputs to place cells. Here, we test the alternative hypothesis that dorsoventral place field differences are due to higher amounts of nonspatial inputs to ventral hippocampal cells. We use a computational model of the entorhinal-hippocampal network to assess the relative contributions of grid scale and nonspatial inputs in determining place field size and stability. In addition, we assess the consequences of grid node firing rate heterogeneity on place field stability. Our results suggest that dorsoventral differences in place cell properties can be better explained by changes in the amount of nonspatial inputs, rather than by changes in the scale of grid cell inputs, and that grid node heterogeneity may have important functional consequences. The observed gradient in field size may reflect a shift from processing primarily spatial information in the dorsal hippocampus to processing more nonspatial, contextual, and emotional information near the ventral hippocampus.

KW - Computational model

KW - Dorsoventral

KW - Grid cells

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Place cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880766832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880766832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hipo.22132

DO - 10.1002/hipo.22132

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 729

EP - 744

JO - Hippocampus

JF - Hippocampus

SN - 1050-9631

IS - 8

ER -