Species' range model metadata standards: RMMS

Cory Merow, Brian S. Maitner, Hannah L. Owens, Jamie M. Kass, Brian Enquist, Walter Jetz, Rob Guralnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The geographic range and ecological niche of species are widely used concepts in ecology, evolution and conservation and many modelling approaches have been developed to quantify each. Niche and distribution modelling methods require a litany of design choices; differences among subdisciplines have created communication barriers that increase isolation of scientific advances. As a result, understanding and reproducing the work of others is difficult, if not impossible. It is often challenging to evaluate whether a model has been built appropriately for its intended application or subsequent reuse. Here, we propose a standardized model metadata framework that enables researchers to understand and evaluate modelling decisions while making models fully citable and reproducible. Such reproducibility is critical for both scientific and policy reports, while international standardization enables better comparison between different scenarios and research groups. Innovation: Range modelling metadata (RMMS) address three challenges: they (a) are designed for convenience to encourage use, (b) accommodate a wide variety of applications, and (c) are extensible to allow the research community to steer them as needed. RMMS are based on a metadata dictionary that specifies a hierarchical structure to catalogue different aspects of the range modelling process. The dictionary balances a constrained, minimalist vocabulary to improve standardization with flexibility for users to modify and extend. To facilitate use, we have developed an R package, rangeModelMetaData, to build templates, automatically fill values from common modelling objects, check for inconsistencies with standards, and suggest values. Main conclusions: Range Modelling Metadata tools foster cross-disciplinary advances in biogeography, conservation and allied disciplines by improving evaluation, model sharing, model searching, comparisons and reproducibility among studies. Our initially proposed standards here are designed to be modified and extended to evolve with research trends and needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

metadata
modeling
standardization
reproducibility
niches
biogeography
niche
fill
innovation
decision making
communication
ecology
decision support systems
communication (human)
researchers

Keywords

  • abundance
  • Maxent
  • niche model
  • R package
  • reproducible research
  • species distribution model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Merow, C., Maitner, B. S., Owens, H. L., Kass, J. M., Enquist, B., Jetz, W., & Guralnick, R. (Accepted/In press). Species' range model metadata standards: RMMS. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12993

Species' range model metadata standards : RMMS. / Merow, Cory; Maitner, Brian S.; Owens, Hannah L.; Kass, Jamie M.; Enquist, Brian; Jetz, Walter; Guralnick, Rob.

In: Global Ecology and Biogeography, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Merow, Cory ; Maitner, Brian S. ; Owens, Hannah L. ; Kass, Jamie M. ; Enquist, Brian ; Jetz, Walter ; Guralnick, Rob. / Species' range model metadata standards : RMMS. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2019.
@article{7b52e9d13fc944aab3b1cdf43edf8584,
title = "Species' range model metadata standards: RMMS",
abstract = "Aim: The geographic range and ecological niche of species are widely used concepts in ecology, evolution and conservation and many modelling approaches have been developed to quantify each. Niche and distribution modelling methods require a litany of design choices; differences among subdisciplines have created communication barriers that increase isolation of scientific advances. As a result, understanding and reproducing the work of others is difficult, if not impossible. It is often challenging to evaluate whether a model has been built appropriately for its intended application or subsequent reuse. Here, we propose a standardized model metadata framework that enables researchers to understand and evaluate modelling decisions while making models fully citable and reproducible. Such reproducibility is critical for both scientific and policy reports, while international standardization enables better comparison between different scenarios and research groups. Innovation: Range modelling metadata (RMMS) address three challenges: they (a) are designed for convenience to encourage use, (b) accommodate a wide variety of applications, and (c) are extensible to allow the research community to steer them as needed. RMMS are based on a metadata dictionary that specifies a hierarchical structure to catalogue different aspects of the range modelling process. The dictionary balances a constrained, minimalist vocabulary to improve standardization with flexibility for users to modify and extend. To facilitate use, we have developed an R package, rangeModelMetaData, to build templates, automatically fill values from common modelling objects, check for inconsistencies with standards, and suggest values. Main conclusions: Range Modelling Metadata tools foster cross-disciplinary advances in biogeography, conservation and allied disciplines by improving evaluation, model sharing, model searching, comparisons and reproducibility among studies. Our initially proposed standards here are designed to be modified and extended to evolve with research trends and needs.",
keywords = "abundance, Maxent, niche model, R package, reproducible research, species distribution model",
author = "Cory Merow and Maitner, {Brian S.} and Owens, {Hannah L.} and Kass, {Jamie M.} and Brian Enquist and Walter Jetz and Rob Guralnick",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/geb.12993",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Global Ecology and Biogeography",
issn = "1466-822X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Species' range model metadata standards

T2 - RMMS

AU - Merow, Cory

AU - Maitner, Brian S.

AU - Owens, Hannah L.

AU - Kass, Jamie M.

AU - Enquist, Brian

AU - Jetz, Walter

AU - Guralnick, Rob

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Aim: The geographic range and ecological niche of species are widely used concepts in ecology, evolution and conservation and many modelling approaches have been developed to quantify each. Niche and distribution modelling methods require a litany of design choices; differences among subdisciplines have created communication barriers that increase isolation of scientific advances. As a result, understanding and reproducing the work of others is difficult, if not impossible. It is often challenging to evaluate whether a model has been built appropriately for its intended application or subsequent reuse. Here, we propose a standardized model metadata framework that enables researchers to understand and evaluate modelling decisions while making models fully citable and reproducible. Such reproducibility is critical for both scientific and policy reports, while international standardization enables better comparison between different scenarios and research groups. Innovation: Range modelling metadata (RMMS) address three challenges: they (a) are designed for convenience to encourage use, (b) accommodate a wide variety of applications, and (c) are extensible to allow the research community to steer them as needed. RMMS are based on a metadata dictionary that specifies a hierarchical structure to catalogue different aspects of the range modelling process. The dictionary balances a constrained, minimalist vocabulary to improve standardization with flexibility for users to modify and extend. To facilitate use, we have developed an R package, rangeModelMetaData, to build templates, automatically fill values from common modelling objects, check for inconsistencies with standards, and suggest values. Main conclusions: Range Modelling Metadata tools foster cross-disciplinary advances in biogeography, conservation and allied disciplines by improving evaluation, model sharing, model searching, comparisons and reproducibility among studies. Our initially proposed standards here are designed to be modified and extended to evolve with research trends and needs.

AB - Aim: The geographic range and ecological niche of species are widely used concepts in ecology, evolution and conservation and many modelling approaches have been developed to quantify each. Niche and distribution modelling methods require a litany of design choices; differences among subdisciplines have created communication barriers that increase isolation of scientific advances. As a result, understanding and reproducing the work of others is difficult, if not impossible. It is often challenging to evaluate whether a model has been built appropriately for its intended application or subsequent reuse. Here, we propose a standardized model metadata framework that enables researchers to understand and evaluate modelling decisions while making models fully citable and reproducible. Such reproducibility is critical for both scientific and policy reports, while international standardization enables better comparison between different scenarios and research groups. Innovation: Range modelling metadata (RMMS) address three challenges: they (a) are designed for convenience to encourage use, (b) accommodate a wide variety of applications, and (c) are extensible to allow the research community to steer them as needed. RMMS are based on a metadata dictionary that specifies a hierarchical structure to catalogue different aspects of the range modelling process. The dictionary balances a constrained, minimalist vocabulary to improve standardization with flexibility for users to modify and extend. To facilitate use, we have developed an R package, rangeModelMetaData, to build templates, automatically fill values from common modelling objects, check for inconsistencies with standards, and suggest values. Main conclusions: Range Modelling Metadata tools foster cross-disciplinary advances in biogeography, conservation and allied disciplines by improving evaluation, model sharing, model searching, comparisons and reproducibility among studies. Our initially proposed standards here are designed to be modified and extended to evolve with research trends and needs.

KW - abundance

KW - Maxent

KW - niche model

KW - R package

KW - reproducible research

KW - species distribution model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071315997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071315997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/geb.12993

DO - 10.1111/geb.12993

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071315997

JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography

JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography

SN - 1466-822X

ER -