Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain

David A. Stidd, Sergio Rivero, Martin E Weinand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. Results: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4% decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. Conclusions: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-470
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pain Research
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2014

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Stimulation
Low Back Pain
Lower Extremity
Visual Analog Scale
Pain
Lead
Epidural Space
Implanted Electrodes
Radiculopathy
Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Spinal Cord
Spine
Thorax
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Laminotomy
  • LBP
  • Paddle electrodes
  • SCS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain. / Stidd, David A.; Rivero, Sergio; Weinand, Martin E.

In: Journal of Pain Research, Vol. 7, 12.08.2014, p. 465-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{193f4c83c40b4c72894da28e42dbbb46,
title = "Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain",
abstract = "Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. Results: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4{\%} decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. Conclusions: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality.",
keywords = "Laminotomy, LBP, Paddle electrodes, SCS",
author = "Stidd, {David A.} and Sergio Rivero and Weinand, {Martin E}",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.2147/JPR.S66414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "465--470",
journal = "Journal of Pain Research",
issn = "1178-7090",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain

AU - Stidd, David A.

AU - Rivero, Sergio

AU - Weinand, Martin E

PY - 2014/8/12

Y1 - 2014/8/12

N2 - Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. Results: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4% decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. Conclusions: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality.

AB - Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. Results: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4% decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. Conclusions: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality.

KW - Laminotomy

KW - LBP

KW - Paddle electrodes

KW - SCS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906094104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906094104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/JPR.S66414

DO - 10.2147/JPR.S66414

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906094104

VL - 7

SP - 465

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Pain Research

JF - Journal of Pain Research

SN - 1178-7090

ER -