Spreading the word or shaping the conversation

"Prosumption" in protest websites

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last several decades, the social movement sector in the United States has been professionalizing, creating a large number of highly professionalized, formal social movement organizations. And yet, over the last decade, digital technologies have been used to undermine long-settled distinctions between producers and consumers in a number of areas of social and economic life as relative amateurs engage in production (e.g., citizen journalism). Drawing an analogy between protest organizers and producers on the one hand, and protest participants and consumers on the other hand, it would seem possible that digital technologies could be used to up-end brightline distinctions between organizers and participants in the protest sector as well. I outline two different ways these prosumptive forces could shape protest and then use a five year panel dataset on websites across 20 different social movement areas to understand the net effect of prosumptive versus professionalizing trends. Findings suggest that while there has been some adoption of disruptive digital technologies by protest-related websites, the majority of sites still limit and circumscribe participant participation to pre-choreographed actions. Findings shed important light on the continuing social organization of protest in the dawning of the digital age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
Pages3-38
Number of pages36
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameResearch in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
Volume36
ISSN (Print)0163786X

Fingerprint

protest
website
conversation
social movement
producer
amateur
journalism
citizen
organization
participation
trend
economics

Keywords

  • Internet
  • Prosumption
  • Social movement organizations
  • Social movements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Earl, J. S. (2013). Spreading the word or shaping the conversation: "Prosumption" in protest websites. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Vol. 36, pp. 3-38). (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change; Vol. 36). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004

Spreading the word or shaping the conversation : "Prosumption" in protest websites. / Earl, Jennifer Suzanne.

Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 36 2013. p. 3-38 (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change; Vol. 36).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Earl, JS 2013, Spreading the word or shaping the conversation: "Prosumption" in protest websites. in Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. vol. 36, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 36, pp. 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004
Earl JS. Spreading the word or shaping the conversation: "Prosumption" in protest websites. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 36. 2013. p. 3-38. (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004
Earl, Jennifer Suzanne. / Spreading the word or shaping the conversation : "Prosumption" in protest websites. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 36 2013. pp. 3-38 (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change).
@inbook{66def7b2359c41719f33ee02514e1ff8,
title = "Spreading the word or shaping the conversation: {"}Prosumption{"} in protest websites",
abstract = "Over the last several decades, the social movement sector in the United States has been professionalizing, creating a large number of highly professionalized, formal social movement organizations. And yet, over the last decade, digital technologies have been used to undermine long-settled distinctions between producers and consumers in a number of areas of social and economic life as relative amateurs engage in production (e.g., citizen journalism). Drawing an analogy between protest organizers and producers on the one hand, and protest participants and consumers on the other hand, it would seem possible that digital technologies could be used to up-end brightline distinctions between organizers and participants in the protest sector as well. I outline two different ways these prosumptive forces could shape protest and then use a five year panel dataset on websites across 20 different social movement areas to understand the net effect of prosumptive versus professionalizing trends. Findings suggest that while there has been some adoption of disruptive digital technologies by protest-related websites, the majority of sites still limit and circumscribe participant participation to pre-choreographed actions. Findings shed important light on the continuing social organization of protest in the dawning of the digital age.",
keywords = "Internet, Prosumption, Social movement organizations, Social movements",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781781907320",
volume = "36",
series = "Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change",
pages = "3--38",
booktitle = "Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Spreading the word or shaping the conversation

T2 - "Prosumption" in protest websites

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Over the last several decades, the social movement sector in the United States has been professionalizing, creating a large number of highly professionalized, formal social movement organizations. And yet, over the last decade, digital technologies have been used to undermine long-settled distinctions between producers and consumers in a number of areas of social and economic life as relative amateurs engage in production (e.g., citizen journalism). Drawing an analogy between protest organizers and producers on the one hand, and protest participants and consumers on the other hand, it would seem possible that digital technologies could be used to up-end brightline distinctions between organizers and participants in the protest sector as well. I outline two different ways these prosumptive forces could shape protest and then use a five year panel dataset on websites across 20 different social movement areas to understand the net effect of prosumptive versus professionalizing trends. Findings suggest that while there has been some adoption of disruptive digital technologies by protest-related websites, the majority of sites still limit and circumscribe participant participation to pre-choreographed actions. Findings shed important light on the continuing social organization of protest in the dawning of the digital age.

AB - Over the last several decades, the social movement sector in the United States has been professionalizing, creating a large number of highly professionalized, formal social movement organizations. And yet, over the last decade, digital technologies have been used to undermine long-settled distinctions between producers and consumers in a number of areas of social and economic life as relative amateurs engage in production (e.g., citizen journalism). Drawing an analogy between protest organizers and producers on the one hand, and protest participants and consumers on the other hand, it would seem possible that digital technologies could be used to up-end brightline distinctions between organizers and participants in the protest sector as well. I outline two different ways these prosumptive forces could shape protest and then use a five year panel dataset on websites across 20 different social movement areas to understand the net effect of prosumptive versus professionalizing trends. Findings suggest that while there has been some adoption of disruptive digital technologies by protest-related websites, the majority of sites still limit and circumscribe participant participation to pre-choreographed actions. Findings shed important light on the continuing social organization of protest in the dawning of the digital age.

KW - Internet

KW - Prosumption

KW - Social movement organizations

KW - Social movements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887563864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887563864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004

DO - 10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781781907320

VL - 36

T3 - Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change

SP - 3

EP - 38

BT - Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change

ER -