State and regional prevalence of sleep disturbance and daytime fatigue

Michael A. Grandner, Nicholas J. Jackson, Wilfred R. Pigeon, Nalaka S. Gooneratne, Nirav P. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Objectives: Social and demographic influences are important for sleep attainment. Geographic location has not been previously explored. Methods: Data from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used (N = 157,319). Participants answered a question on Sleep Disturbance and Daytime Fatigue. Thirty-six states/regions provided data on these items. Prevalence estimates were adjusted for age, sex, ethnoracial group, education, income, employment, general health, healthcare access, and depression. Chi-squared tests were conducted across states and census regions, and pseudo-R 2 values were computed for the effect of state, relative to other predictors. To evaluate potential mediators of census region differences, an analysis of p value change associated with specific covariates and covariate groups was undertaken. Results: Adjusted prevalence rates of Sleep Disturbance differed across states/regions overall (χ 2 = 412.3, p < 0.0001), as well as separately for men (χ 2 = 139.5, p < 0.0001) and women (χ 2 = 350.0, p < 0.0001), as did rates of Daytime Fatigue overall (χ 2 = 245.7, p < 0.0001), and separately for men (χ 2 = 117.5, p < 0.0001) and women (χ 2 = 181.2, p < 0.0001). Analysis of pseudo-R 2 values revealed that despite these signifi cant findings, state differences were an overall weak predictor, representing 1.30% to 1.73% of the magnitude of the effect of the best predictor (mental health). When Census regions were compared, significant differences were found for Sleep Disturbance (p = 0.002), but after adjustment for covariates, these were no longer significant. Differences existed for Daytime Fatigue in adjusted analyses overall (p < 0.0001), with the West reporting the fewest complaints and the South reporting the most. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that reports of sleep related complaints vary across states, independent (at least partially) of factors that influence circadian rhythms (e.g., latitude).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-86
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Fatigue
  • Geographic factors
  • Health services
  • Sleep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'State and regional prevalence of sleep disturbance and daytime fatigue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this