State power and diffusion processes in the ratification of global environmental treaties, 1981–2008

Yoshiki Yamagata, Jue Yang, Joseph J Galaskiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There have been many explanations for why countries ratify global environmental treaties. They range from neorealist theory, to hegemony theory, world society theory, and network embeddedness theory. Drawing on hegemonic transition theory, this paper provides evidence that prior to the fall of the Soviet Union, strong and weak countries ratified a treaty if the USA or the USSR ratified the treaty first. After the fall of the Soviet Union, countries’ proximity to world society institutions increased the likelihood of ratifying a treaty, and only weaker countries emulated the ratifications of the USA and Russia. However, weaker countries also emulated economic, religious, and language peers, diplomatic ties, and neighbors as well. In contrast, more powerful countries ratified treaties more independently. We studied the ratifications of eight universal environmental treaties by 166 countries between 1981 and 2008 and showed that as the geopolitical context changed, the diffusion process changed. The paper argues that the hegemonic transition which took place in the late 1980s and early 1990s was an enabling event that helped to explain the new roles that major powers assumed in the 1990s and 2000s and opened the door to the ascendency of global institutions and broader participation in the environmental regime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 20 2016

Fingerprint

ratification
treaty
USSR
world society
hegemony
Diffusion process
Ratification
Treaties
Russia
participation
event
language
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • International environmental agreements
  • Policy diffusion
  • Social networks
  • State power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Cite this

@article{0165cd7e7dc8472fb52616908473f524,
title = "State power and diffusion processes in the ratification of global environmental treaties, 1981–2008",
abstract = "There have been many explanations for why countries ratify global environmental treaties. They range from neorealist theory, to hegemony theory, world society theory, and network embeddedness theory. Drawing on hegemonic transition theory, this paper provides evidence that prior to the fall of the Soviet Union, strong and weak countries ratified a treaty if the USA or the USSR ratified the treaty first. After the fall of the Soviet Union, countries’ proximity to world society institutions increased the likelihood of ratifying a treaty, and only weaker countries emulated the ratifications of the USA and Russia. However, weaker countries also emulated economic, religious, and language peers, diplomatic ties, and neighbors as well. In contrast, more powerful countries ratified treaties more independently. We studied the ratifications of eight universal environmental treaties by 166 countries between 1981 and 2008 and showed that as the geopolitical context changed, the diffusion process changed. The paper argues that the hegemonic transition which took place in the late 1980s and early 1990s was an enabling event that helped to explain the new roles that major powers assumed in the 1990s and 2000s and opened the door to the ascendency of global institutions and broader participation in the environmental regime.",
keywords = "International environmental agreements, Policy diffusion, Social networks, State power",
author = "Yoshiki Yamagata and Jue Yang and Galaskiewicz, {Joseph J}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-016-9332-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State power and diffusion processes in the ratification of global environmental treaties, 1981–2008

AU - Yamagata, Yoshiki

AU - Yang, Jue

AU - Galaskiewicz, Joseph J

PY - 2016/7/20

Y1 - 2016/7/20

N2 - There have been many explanations for why countries ratify global environmental treaties. They range from neorealist theory, to hegemony theory, world society theory, and network embeddedness theory. Drawing on hegemonic transition theory, this paper provides evidence that prior to the fall of the Soviet Union, strong and weak countries ratified a treaty if the USA or the USSR ratified the treaty first. After the fall of the Soviet Union, countries’ proximity to world society institutions increased the likelihood of ratifying a treaty, and only weaker countries emulated the ratifications of the USA and Russia. However, weaker countries also emulated economic, religious, and language peers, diplomatic ties, and neighbors as well. In contrast, more powerful countries ratified treaties more independently. We studied the ratifications of eight universal environmental treaties by 166 countries between 1981 and 2008 and showed that as the geopolitical context changed, the diffusion process changed. The paper argues that the hegemonic transition which took place in the late 1980s and early 1990s was an enabling event that helped to explain the new roles that major powers assumed in the 1990s and 2000s and opened the door to the ascendency of global institutions and broader participation in the environmental regime.

AB - There have been many explanations for why countries ratify global environmental treaties. They range from neorealist theory, to hegemony theory, world society theory, and network embeddedness theory. Drawing on hegemonic transition theory, this paper provides evidence that prior to the fall of the Soviet Union, strong and weak countries ratified a treaty if the USA or the USSR ratified the treaty first. After the fall of the Soviet Union, countries’ proximity to world society institutions increased the likelihood of ratifying a treaty, and only weaker countries emulated the ratifications of the USA and Russia. However, weaker countries also emulated economic, religious, and language peers, diplomatic ties, and neighbors as well. In contrast, more powerful countries ratified treaties more independently. We studied the ratifications of eight universal environmental treaties by 166 countries between 1981 and 2008 and showed that as the geopolitical context changed, the diffusion process changed. The paper argues that the hegemonic transition which took place in the late 1980s and early 1990s was an enabling event that helped to explain the new roles that major powers assumed in the 1990s and 2000s and opened the door to the ascendency of global institutions and broader participation in the environmental regime.

KW - International environmental agreements

KW - Policy diffusion

KW - Social networks

KW - State power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979255688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979255688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-016-9332-y

DO - 10.1007/s10784-016-9332-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

ER -