Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials: Protocol for a systematic review

Mallorie Fiero, Shuang Huang, Melanie L Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants in groups, rather than as individuals, and are key tools used to assess interventions in health research where treatment contamination is likely or if individual randomisation is not feasible. Missing outcome data can reduce power in trials, including in CRTs, and is a potential source of bias. The current review focuses on evaluating methods used in statistical analysis and handling of missing data with respect to the primary outcome in CRTs. Methods and analysis: We will search for CRTs published between August 2013 and July 2014 using PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. We will identify relevant studies by screening titles and abstracts, and examining full-text articles based on our predefined study inclusion criteria. 86 studies will be randomly chosen to be included in our review. Two independent reviewers will collect data from each study using a standardised, prepiloted data extraction template. Our findings will be summarised and presented using descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination: This methodological systematic review does not need ethical approval because there are no data used in our study that are linked to individual patient data. After completion of this systematic review, data will be immediately analysed, and findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere007378
JournalBMJ Open
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Protocols
Random Allocation
PubMed
Ethics
Publications
Health
Research
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials : Protocol for a systematic review. / Fiero, Mallorie; Huang, Shuang; Bell, Melanie L.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 5, e007378, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{52bbb171027a41f2b07742ab273e852d,
title = "Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials: Protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants in groups, rather than as individuals, and are key tools used to assess interventions in health research where treatment contamination is likely or if individual randomisation is not feasible. Missing outcome data can reduce power in trials, including in CRTs, and is a potential source of bias. The current review focuses on evaluating methods used in statistical analysis and handling of missing data with respect to the primary outcome in CRTs. Methods and analysis: We will search for CRTs published between August 2013 and July 2014 using PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. We will identify relevant studies by screening titles and abstracts, and examining full-text articles based on our predefined study inclusion criteria. 86 studies will be randomly chosen to be included in our review. Two independent reviewers will collect data from each study using a standardised, prepiloted data extraction template. Our findings will be summarised and presented using descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination: This methodological systematic review does not need ethical approval because there are no data used in our study that are linked to individual patient data. After completion of this systematic review, data will be immediately analysed, and findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.",
author = "Mallorie Fiero and Shuang Huang and Bell, {Melanie L}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials

T2 - Protocol for a systematic review

AU - Fiero, Mallorie

AU - Huang, Shuang

AU - Bell, Melanie L

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants in groups, rather than as individuals, and are key tools used to assess interventions in health research where treatment contamination is likely or if individual randomisation is not feasible. Missing outcome data can reduce power in trials, including in CRTs, and is a potential source of bias. The current review focuses on evaluating methods used in statistical analysis and handling of missing data with respect to the primary outcome in CRTs. Methods and analysis: We will search for CRTs published between August 2013 and July 2014 using PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. We will identify relevant studies by screening titles and abstracts, and examining full-text articles based on our predefined study inclusion criteria. 86 studies will be randomly chosen to be included in our review. Two independent reviewers will collect data from each study using a standardised, prepiloted data extraction template. Our findings will be summarised and presented using descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination: This methodological systematic review does not need ethical approval because there are no data used in our study that are linked to individual patient data. After completion of this systematic review, data will be immediately analysed, and findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

AB - Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants in groups, rather than as individuals, and are key tools used to assess interventions in health research where treatment contamination is likely or if individual randomisation is not feasible. Missing outcome data can reduce power in trials, including in CRTs, and is a potential source of bias. The current review focuses on evaluating methods used in statistical analysis and handling of missing data with respect to the primary outcome in CRTs. Methods and analysis: We will search for CRTs published between August 2013 and July 2014 using PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. We will identify relevant studies by screening titles and abstracts, and examining full-text articles based on our predefined study inclusion criteria. 86 studies will be randomly chosen to be included in our review. Two independent reviewers will collect data from each study using a standardised, prepiloted data extraction template. Our findings will be summarised and presented using descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination: This methodological systematic review does not need ethical approval because there are no data used in our study that are linked to individual patient data. After completion of this systematic review, data will be immediately analysed, and findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930008242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930008242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007378

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007378

M3 - Article

C2 - 25971707

AN - SCOPUS:84930008242

VL - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e007378

ER -