Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations

Philip I Harber, R. Schnur, J. Emery, S. Brooks, Y. Ploy-Song-Sang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The manner in which pulmonary function test results are employed in the assessment of respiratory disability may be affected by 4 statistical choices: (1) choice of prediction equation(s), (2) adjustment factors (such as sex and race), (3) criterion values, and (4) method of comparison of observed to predicted normal test values. The records of 900 respiratory disability applicants were employed to estimate the direction and magnitude of the effect of these choices on the overall number of persons who would be declared 'disabled' and upon the manner in which personal characteristics (e.g., sex, race, height, age) affect the likelihood of being declared 'disabled'. Choice of prediction equation had minor effects, and adjustment for race and sex had more significant effects. Choice of criterion value affected the overall number and, in certain instances (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance), the distribution of 'disability' declarations. Method of comparison (percent of predicted, difference of predicted minus observed or minimal value criterion) had major effects upon the distribution of 'disability' declarations between population subgroups. Preliminary analysis therefore suggests that these statistical choices should be carefully manipulated in the design of a disability system to facilitate achievement of the system's goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-418
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease
Volume128
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disability Insurance
Social Adjustment
Social Security
Respiratory Function Tests
Sex Characteristics
Reference Values
Population
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Harber, P. I., Schnur, R., Emery, J., Brooks, S., & Ploy-Song-Sang, Y. (1983). Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 128(3), 413-418.

Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations. / Harber, Philip I; Schnur, R.; Emery, J.; Brooks, S.; Ploy-Song-Sang, Y.

In: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 128, No. 3, 1983, p. 413-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harber, PI, Schnur, R, Emery, J, Brooks, S & Ploy-Song-Sang, Y 1983, 'Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations', American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 413-418.
Harber PI, Schnur R, Emery J, Brooks S, Ploy-Song-Sang Y. Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1983;128(3):413-418.
Harber, Philip I ; Schnur, R. ; Emery, J. ; Brooks, S. ; Ploy-Song-Sang, Y. / Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations. In: American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1983 ; Vol. 128, No. 3. pp. 413-418.
@article{5f3735f22199427da35865566e45d6a4,
title = "Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations",
abstract = "The manner in which pulmonary function test results are employed in the assessment of respiratory disability may be affected by 4 statistical choices: (1) choice of prediction equation(s), (2) adjustment factors (such as sex and race), (3) criterion values, and (4) method of comparison of observed to predicted normal test values. The records of 900 respiratory disability applicants were employed to estimate the direction and magnitude of the effect of these choices on the overall number of persons who would be declared 'disabled' and upon the manner in which personal characteristics (e.g., sex, race, height, age) affect the likelihood of being declared 'disabled'. Choice of prediction equation had minor effects, and adjustment for race and sex had more significant effects. Choice of criterion value affected the overall number and, in certain instances (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance), the distribution of 'disability' declarations. Method of comparison (percent of predicted, difference of predicted minus observed or minimal value criterion) had major effects upon the distribution of 'disability' declarations between population subgroups. Preliminary analysis therefore suggests that these statistical choices should be carefully manipulated in the design of a disability system to facilitate achievement of the system's goals.",
author = "Harber, {Philip I} and R. Schnur and J. Emery and S. Brooks and Y. Ploy-Song-Sang",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "413--418",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical 'biases' in respiratory disability determinations

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Schnur, R.

AU - Emery, J.

AU - Brooks, S.

AU - Ploy-Song-Sang, Y.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The manner in which pulmonary function test results are employed in the assessment of respiratory disability may be affected by 4 statistical choices: (1) choice of prediction equation(s), (2) adjustment factors (such as sex and race), (3) criterion values, and (4) method of comparison of observed to predicted normal test values. The records of 900 respiratory disability applicants were employed to estimate the direction and magnitude of the effect of these choices on the overall number of persons who would be declared 'disabled' and upon the manner in which personal characteristics (e.g., sex, race, height, age) affect the likelihood of being declared 'disabled'. Choice of prediction equation had minor effects, and adjustment for race and sex had more significant effects. Choice of criterion value affected the overall number and, in certain instances (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance), the distribution of 'disability' declarations. Method of comparison (percent of predicted, difference of predicted minus observed or minimal value criterion) had major effects upon the distribution of 'disability' declarations between population subgroups. Preliminary analysis therefore suggests that these statistical choices should be carefully manipulated in the design of a disability system to facilitate achievement of the system's goals.

AB - The manner in which pulmonary function test results are employed in the assessment of respiratory disability may be affected by 4 statistical choices: (1) choice of prediction equation(s), (2) adjustment factors (such as sex and race), (3) criterion values, and (4) method of comparison of observed to predicted normal test values. The records of 900 respiratory disability applicants were employed to estimate the direction and magnitude of the effect of these choices on the overall number of persons who would be declared 'disabled' and upon the manner in which personal characteristics (e.g., sex, race, height, age) affect the likelihood of being declared 'disabled'. Choice of prediction equation had minor effects, and adjustment for race and sex had more significant effects. Choice of criterion value affected the overall number and, in certain instances (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance), the distribution of 'disability' declarations. Method of comparison (percent of predicted, difference of predicted minus observed or minimal value criterion) had major effects upon the distribution of 'disability' declarations between population subgroups. Preliminary analysis therefore suggests that these statistical choices should be carefully manipulated in the design of a disability system to facilitate achievement of the system's goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020525825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020525825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6614635

AN - SCOPUS:0020525825

VL - 128

SP - 413

EP - 418

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 3

ER -