Statistics for Method Verification of Qualitative Assays in Clinical Microbiology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite improvement over the last decade, inadequate method verification strategies and documentation are still common laboratory inspection deficiencies. Some of the gaps occur because microbiologists may not use scientific experiment concepts, such as experimental design, data validation, biostatistics, and electronic documentation, that can improve their verification strategies for new test methods. Other gaps occur because laboratory resources are often limited. Clinical laboratories face tough choices when they consider implementing a new test method, and this review summarizes the basic statistical concepts that microbiologists need to critically plan and review qualitative method verification with the aim of determining whether a new diagnostic test is fit for patient testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-68
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Microbiology Newsletter
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Microbiology
Documentation
Biostatistics
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Statistics for Method Verification of Qualitative Assays in Clinical Microbiology. / Wolk, Donna.

In: Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, Vol. 39, No. 8, 15.04.2017, p. 59-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1dae107f473499f855d3887eee6e660,
title = "Statistics for Method Verification of Qualitative Assays in Clinical Microbiology",
abstract = "Despite improvement over the last decade, inadequate method verification strategies and documentation are still common laboratory inspection deficiencies. Some of the gaps occur because microbiologists may not use scientific experiment concepts, such as experimental design, data validation, biostatistics, and electronic documentation, that can improve their verification strategies for new test methods. Other gaps occur because laboratory resources are often limited. Clinical laboratories face tough choices when they consider implementing a new test method, and this review summarizes the basic statistical concepts that microbiologists need to critically plan and review qualitative method verification with the aim of determining whether a new diagnostic test is fit for patient testing.",
author = "Donna Wolk",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2017.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "59--68",
journal = "Clinical Microbiology Newsletter",
issn = "0196-4399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistics for Method Verification of Qualitative Assays in Clinical Microbiology

AU - Wolk, Donna

PY - 2017/4/15

Y1 - 2017/4/15

N2 - Despite improvement over the last decade, inadequate method verification strategies and documentation are still common laboratory inspection deficiencies. Some of the gaps occur because microbiologists may not use scientific experiment concepts, such as experimental design, data validation, biostatistics, and electronic documentation, that can improve their verification strategies for new test methods. Other gaps occur because laboratory resources are often limited. Clinical laboratories face tough choices when they consider implementing a new test method, and this review summarizes the basic statistical concepts that microbiologists need to critically plan and review qualitative method verification with the aim of determining whether a new diagnostic test is fit for patient testing.

AB - Despite improvement over the last decade, inadequate method verification strategies and documentation are still common laboratory inspection deficiencies. Some of the gaps occur because microbiologists may not use scientific experiment concepts, such as experimental design, data validation, biostatistics, and electronic documentation, that can improve their verification strategies for new test methods. Other gaps occur because laboratory resources are often limited. Clinical laboratories face tough choices when they consider implementing a new test method, and this review summarizes the basic statistical concepts that microbiologists need to critically plan and review qualitative method verification with the aim of determining whether a new diagnostic test is fit for patient testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016761909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016761909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2017.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2017.03.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016761909

VL - 39

SP - 59

EP - 68

JO - Clinical Microbiology Newsletter

JF - Clinical Microbiology Newsletter

SN - 0196-4399

IS - 8

ER -