Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers

Thomas J Volgy, Renato Corbetta, J. Patrick Rhamey, Ryan G. Baird, Keith A. Grant

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The salience of major powers and the status they are attributed in international politics have been of central concern to both scholars and practitioners. The focus on major powers is at least as old as Thucydides, who noted in the Melian debate the unique advantages these states possessed in structuring relations between states. More recently, realists, neorealists, long-cycle theorists, hierarchical theorists, power transition theorists, and liberal institutionalists have all focused on major powers as critical to ordering interstate relations, as well as attempts to change those orders. One aspect of being a major power is the status one receives from the policy makers of other states. The attribution of status to major powers - separate from their capabilities - has stubbornly persisted in significance across empirical conflict models, appearing as a predictor of conflict initiation, alliance formation and membership, involvement in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and crises, and multilateralism. Such status attribution, as both international relations (IR) scholars and historians have long recognized, is not a mirror reflection of the capabilities of these powers. Italy and Austria-Hungary are two clear historical cases of states that continued to receive high status attribution long after they no longer had the capacity or the willingness to act as major powers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStatus in World Politics
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages58-84
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)9781107444409, 9781107059276
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

International Politics
attribution
Austria-Hungary
multilateralism
international relations
historian
Italy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Volgy, T. J., Corbetta, R., Rhamey, J. P., Baird, R. G., & Grant, K. A. (2014). Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. In Status in World Politics (pp. 58-84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005

Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. / Volgy, Thomas J; Corbetta, Renato; Rhamey, J. Patrick; Baird, Ryan G.; Grant, Keith A.

Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 58-84.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Volgy, TJ, Corbetta, R, Rhamey, JP, Baird, RG & Grant, KA 2014, Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. in Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 58-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005
Volgy TJ, Corbetta R, Rhamey JP, Baird RG, Grant KA. Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. In Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 58-84 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005
Volgy, Thomas J ; Corbetta, Renato ; Rhamey, J. Patrick ; Baird, Ryan G. ; Grant, Keith A. / Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 58-84
@inbook{da2dd20872254278938e2b84e0912da9,
title = "Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers",
abstract = "The salience of major powers and the status they are attributed in international politics have been of central concern to both scholars and practitioners. The focus on major powers is at least as old as Thucydides, who noted in the Melian debate the unique advantages these states possessed in structuring relations between states. More recently, realists, neorealists, long-cycle theorists, hierarchical theorists, power transition theorists, and liberal institutionalists have all focused on major powers as critical to ordering interstate relations, as well as attempts to change those orders. One aspect of being a major power is the status one receives from the policy makers of other states. The attribution of status to major powers - separate from their capabilities - has stubbornly persisted in significance across empirical conflict models, appearing as a predictor of conflict initiation, alliance formation and membership, involvement in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and crises, and multilateralism. Such status attribution, as both international relations (IR) scholars and historians have long recognized, is not a mirror reflection of the capabilities of these powers. Italy and Austria-Hungary are two clear historical cases of states that continued to receive high status attribution long after they no longer had the capacity or the willingness to act as major powers.",
author = "Volgy, {Thomas J} and Renato Corbetta and Rhamey, {J. Patrick} and Baird, {Ryan G.} and Grant, {Keith A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107444409",
pages = "58--84",
booktitle = "Status in World Politics",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers

AU - Volgy, Thomas J

AU - Corbetta, Renato

AU - Rhamey, J. Patrick

AU - Baird, Ryan G.

AU - Grant, Keith A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The salience of major powers and the status they are attributed in international politics have been of central concern to both scholars and practitioners. The focus on major powers is at least as old as Thucydides, who noted in the Melian debate the unique advantages these states possessed in structuring relations between states. More recently, realists, neorealists, long-cycle theorists, hierarchical theorists, power transition theorists, and liberal institutionalists have all focused on major powers as critical to ordering interstate relations, as well as attempts to change those orders. One aspect of being a major power is the status one receives from the policy makers of other states. The attribution of status to major powers - separate from their capabilities - has stubbornly persisted in significance across empirical conflict models, appearing as a predictor of conflict initiation, alliance formation and membership, involvement in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and crises, and multilateralism. Such status attribution, as both international relations (IR) scholars and historians have long recognized, is not a mirror reflection of the capabilities of these powers. Italy and Austria-Hungary are two clear historical cases of states that continued to receive high status attribution long after they no longer had the capacity or the willingness to act as major powers.

AB - The salience of major powers and the status they are attributed in international politics have been of central concern to both scholars and practitioners. The focus on major powers is at least as old as Thucydides, who noted in the Melian debate the unique advantages these states possessed in structuring relations between states. More recently, realists, neorealists, long-cycle theorists, hierarchical theorists, power transition theorists, and liberal institutionalists have all focused on major powers as critical to ordering interstate relations, as well as attempts to change those orders. One aspect of being a major power is the status one receives from the policy makers of other states. The attribution of status to major powers - separate from their capabilities - has stubbornly persisted in significance across empirical conflict models, appearing as a predictor of conflict initiation, alliance formation and membership, involvement in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and crises, and multilateralism. Such status attribution, as both international relations (IR) scholars and historians have long recognized, is not a mirror reflection of the capabilities of these powers. Italy and Austria-Hungary are two clear historical cases of states that continued to receive high status attribution long after they no longer had the capacity or the willingness to act as major powers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923559658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923559658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107444409.005

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107444409

SN - 9781107059276

SP - 58

EP - 84

BT - Status in World Politics

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -