Straight from the source

Accounting for scientific success

Erin E Leahey, Cindy L. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do highly cited scientists account for their success? A number of approaches have been used to explain scientific success, but none incorporates scientists' own understandings, which are critical to a complete, process-oriented explanation. We remedy this oversight by incorporating scientists' own descriptions of the value of their work, as reflected in essays written by authors of highly cited articles ('Citation Classics'). As cultural objects, these essays reveal not only factors perceived to be associated with success but also reflect narrative conventions, and thereby elucidate the culture surrounding success. We enlist Charles Ragin's Qualitative Comparative Analysis to analyze how factors mentioned in these accounts work in conjunction. Our results show that three ingredients - relationships, usefulness to others, and overcoming challenges - are found in a large majority of scientific success stories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)927-951
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

remedies
narrative
Values
Usefulness
Comparative Analysis
Classical Studies
Cultural Objects
Citations

Keywords

  • citations
  • narrative accounts
  • scientific scholarship
  • scientific success

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Straight from the source : Accounting for scientific success. / Leahey, Erin E; Cain, Cindy L.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 43, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 927-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91b0202bdd3a481abcce211dc82e35f3,
title = "Straight from the source: Accounting for scientific success",
abstract = "How do highly cited scientists account for their success? A number of approaches have been used to explain scientific success, but none incorporates scientists' own understandings, which are critical to a complete, process-oriented explanation. We remedy this oversight by incorporating scientists' own descriptions of the value of their work, as reflected in essays written by authors of highly cited articles ('Citation Classics'). As cultural objects, these essays reveal not only factors perceived to be associated with success but also reflect narrative conventions, and thereby elucidate the culture surrounding success. We enlist Charles Ragin's Qualitative Comparative Analysis to analyze how factors mentioned in these accounts work in conjunction. Our results show that three ingredients - relationships, usefulness to others, and overcoming challenges - are found in a large majority of scientific success stories.",
keywords = "citations, narrative accounts, scientific scholarship, scientific success",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E} and Cain, {Cindy L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0306312713484820",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "927--951",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Straight from the source

T2 - Accounting for scientific success

AU - Leahey, Erin E

AU - Cain, Cindy L.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - How do highly cited scientists account for their success? A number of approaches have been used to explain scientific success, but none incorporates scientists' own understandings, which are critical to a complete, process-oriented explanation. We remedy this oversight by incorporating scientists' own descriptions of the value of their work, as reflected in essays written by authors of highly cited articles ('Citation Classics'). As cultural objects, these essays reveal not only factors perceived to be associated with success but also reflect narrative conventions, and thereby elucidate the culture surrounding success. We enlist Charles Ragin's Qualitative Comparative Analysis to analyze how factors mentioned in these accounts work in conjunction. Our results show that three ingredients - relationships, usefulness to others, and overcoming challenges - are found in a large majority of scientific success stories.

AB - How do highly cited scientists account for their success? A number of approaches have been used to explain scientific success, but none incorporates scientists' own understandings, which are critical to a complete, process-oriented explanation. We remedy this oversight by incorporating scientists' own descriptions of the value of their work, as reflected in essays written by authors of highly cited articles ('Citation Classics'). As cultural objects, these essays reveal not only factors perceived to be associated with success but also reflect narrative conventions, and thereby elucidate the culture surrounding success. We enlist Charles Ragin's Qualitative Comparative Analysis to analyze how factors mentioned in these accounts work in conjunction. Our results show that three ingredients - relationships, usefulness to others, and overcoming challenges - are found in a large majority of scientific success stories.

KW - citations

KW - narrative accounts

KW - scientific scholarship

KW - scientific success

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888232553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888232553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312713484820

DO - 10.1177/0306312713484820

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 927

EP - 951

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 6

ER -