STRANGER AND ACQUAINTANCE RAPE

Are There Differences In the Victim's Experience?

Mary P Koss, Thomas E. Dinero, Cynthia A. Seibel, Susan L. Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

362 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most published research on the victim–offender relationship has been based on small samples that consisted mainly of women who were raped by nonintimate and nonromantic acquaintances, who viewed their experience as rape, and/or who were seeking treatment. In the present study, 489 rape victims were located among a national sample of 3,187 female college students by a self‐report survey that avoided reliance on help‐seekers. Two sets of comparisons were performed. First, the experiences reported by victims of stranger rape (n= 52) were compared with those of victims of acquaintance rape (n= 416). Then, the experiences of women assaulted by different types of acquaintances were compared including nonromantic acquaintances (n= 122), casual dates (n= 103), steady dates (n= 147), and spouses or other family members (n= 44). Rapes by acquaintances, compared with strangers, were more likely to involve a single offender and multiple episodes, were less likely to be seen as rape or to be revealed to anyone, and were similar in terms of the victim's resistance. In general, acquaintance rapes were rated as less violent than stranger rapes. The exception was rapes by husbands or other family members which were rated equally violent to stranger rapes but were much less likely to occur in a context of drinking or other drug use. In spite of these different crime characteristics, virtually no differences were found among any of the groups in their levels of psychological symptoms. A significant feature of these data is that they have tapped the experiences of unreported and unacknowledged rape victims, a group that is potentially much larger than the group of identified victims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rape
rape
experience
Spouses
family member
Acquaintance
Stranger
Group
Crime
husband
spouse
Drinking
drug use
offender
offense
Students
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

STRANGER AND ACQUAINTANCE RAPE : Are There Differences In the Victim's Experience? / Koss, Mary P; Dinero, Thomas E.; Seibel, Cynthia A.; Cox, Susan L.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1988, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koss, Mary P ; Dinero, Thomas E. ; Seibel, Cynthia A. ; Cox, Susan L. / STRANGER AND ACQUAINTANCE RAPE : Are There Differences In the Victim's Experience?. In: Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1988 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 1-24.
@article{b1927be2bee845bb8af9722e64929766,
title = "STRANGER AND ACQUAINTANCE RAPE: Are There Differences In the Victim's Experience?",
abstract = "Most published research on the victim–offender relationship has been based on small samples that consisted mainly of women who were raped by nonintimate and nonromantic acquaintances, who viewed their experience as rape, and/or who were seeking treatment. In the present study, 489 rape victims were located among a national sample of 3,187 female college students by a self‐report survey that avoided reliance on help‐seekers. Two sets of comparisons were performed. First, the experiences reported by victims of stranger rape (n= 52) were compared with those of victims of acquaintance rape (n= 416). Then, the experiences of women assaulted by different types of acquaintances were compared including nonromantic acquaintances (n= 122), casual dates (n= 103), steady dates (n= 147), and spouses or other family members (n= 44). Rapes by acquaintances, compared with strangers, were more likely to involve a single offender and multiple episodes, were less likely to be seen as rape or to be revealed to anyone, and were similar in terms of the victim's resistance. In general, acquaintance rapes were rated as less violent than stranger rapes. The exception was rapes by husbands or other family members which were rated equally violent to stranger rapes but were much less likely to occur in a context of drinking or other drug use. In spite of these different crime characteristics, virtually no differences were found among any of the groups in their levels of psychological symptoms. A significant feature of these data is that they have tapped the experiences of unreported and unacknowledged rape victims, a group that is potentially much larger than the group of identified victims.",
author = "Koss, {Mary P} and Dinero, {Thomas E.} and Seibel, {Cynthia A.} and Cox, {Susan L.}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - STRANGER AND ACQUAINTANCE RAPE

T2 - Are There Differences In the Victim's Experience?

AU - Koss, Mary P

AU - Dinero, Thomas E.

AU - Seibel, Cynthia A.

AU - Cox, Susan L.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Most published research on the victim–offender relationship has been based on small samples that consisted mainly of women who were raped by nonintimate and nonromantic acquaintances, who viewed their experience as rape, and/or who were seeking treatment. In the present study, 489 rape victims were located among a national sample of 3,187 female college students by a self‐report survey that avoided reliance on help‐seekers. Two sets of comparisons were performed. First, the experiences reported by victims of stranger rape (n= 52) were compared with those of victims of acquaintance rape (n= 416). Then, the experiences of women assaulted by different types of acquaintances were compared including nonromantic acquaintances (n= 122), casual dates (n= 103), steady dates (n= 147), and spouses or other family members (n= 44). Rapes by acquaintances, compared with strangers, were more likely to involve a single offender and multiple episodes, were less likely to be seen as rape or to be revealed to anyone, and were similar in terms of the victim's resistance. In general, acquaintance rapes were rated as less violent than stranger rapes. The exception was rapes by husbands or other family members which were rated equally violent to stranger rapes but were much less likely to occur in a context of drinking or other drug use. In spite of these different crime characteristics, virtually no differences were found among any of the groups in their levels of psychological symptoms. A significant feature of these data is that they have tapped the experiences of unreported and unacknowledged rape victims, a group that is potentially much larger than the group of identified victims.

AB - Most published research on the victim–offender relationship has been based on small samples that consisted mainly of women who were raped by nonintimate and nonromantic acquaintances, who viewed their experience as rape, and/or who were seeking treatment. In the present study, 489 rape victims were located among a national sample of 3,187 female college students by a self‐report survey that avoided reliance on help‐seekers. Two sets of comparisons were performed. First, the experiences reported by victims of stranger rape (n= 52) were compared with those of victims of acquaintance rape (n= 416). Then, the experiences of women assaulted by different types of acquaintances were compared including nonromantic acquaintances (n= 122), casual dates (n= 103), steady dates (n= 147), and spouses or other family members (n= 44). Rapes by acquaintances, compared with strangers, were more likely to involve a single offender and multiple episodes, were less likely to be seen as rape or to be revealed to anyone, and were similar in terms of the victim's resistance. In general, acquaintance rapes were rated as less violent than stranger rapes. The exception was rapes by husbands or other family members which were rated equally violent to stranger rapes but were much less likely to occur in a context of drinking or other drug use. In spite of these different crime characteristics, virtually no differences were found among any of the groups in their levels of psychological symptoms. A significant feature of these data is that they have tapped the experiences of unreported and unacknowledged rape victims, a group that is potentially much larger than the group of identified victims.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983979151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983979151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00924.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

IS - 1

ER -