Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns

Natasha Warner, Anne Cutler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Evidence from spoken word recognition suggests that for English listeners, distinguishing full versus reduced vowels is important, but discerning stress differences involving the same full vowel (as in mu- from music or museum) is not. In Dutch, in contrast, the latter distinction is important. This difference arises from the relative frequency of unstressed full vowels in the two vocabularies. The goal of this paper is to determine how this difference in the lexicon influences the perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Methods: All possible sequences of two segments (diphones) in Dutch and in English were presented to native listeners in gated fragments. We recorded identification performance over time throughout the speech signal. The data were here analysed specifically for patterns in perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Results: The data reveal significantly larger stress effects (whereby unstressed vowels are harder to identify than stressed vowels) in English than in Dutch. Both language-specific and shared patterns appear regarding which vowels show stress effects. Conclusion: We explain the larger stress effect in English as reflecting the processing demands caused by the difference in use of unstressed vowels in the lexicon. The larger stress effect in English is due to relative inexperience with processing unstressed full vowels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-106
Number of pages26
JournalPhonetica
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 7 2016

Fingerprint

vowels
vocabulary
language
listener
museum
music
Vocabulary
Vowel Perception
Language
museums
Unstressed Vowel
performance
evidence
fragments
Listeners
Lexicon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns. / Warner, Natasha; Cutler, Anne.

In: Phonetica, 07.10.2016, p. 81-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef6f280faf9e4b63a8f3397b64617c42,
title = "Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Evidence from spoken word recognition suggests that for English listeners, distinguishing full versus reduced vowels is important, but discerning stress differences involving the same full vowel (as in mu- from music or museum) is not. In Dutch, in contrast, the latter distinction is important. This difference arises from the relative frequency of unstressed full vowels in the two vocabularies. The goal of this paper is to determine how this difference in the lexicon influences the perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Methods: All possible sequences of two segments (diphones) in Dutch and in English were presented to native listeners in gated fragments. We recorded identification performance over time throughout the speech signal. The data were here analysed specifically for patterns in perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Results: The data reveal significantly larger stress effects (whereby unstressed vowels are harder to identify than stressed vowels) in English than in Dutch. Both language-specific and shared patterns appear regarding which vowels show stress effects. Conclusion: We explain the larger stress effect in English as reflecting the processing demands caused by the difference in use of unstressed vowels in the lexicon. The larger stress effect in English is due to relative inexperience with processing unstressed full vowels.",
author = "Natasha Warner and Anne Cutler",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1159/000447428",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "81--106",
journal = "Phonetica",
issn = "0031-8388",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns

AU - Warner, Natasha

AU - Cutler, Anne

PY - 2016/10/7

Y1 - 2016/10/7

N2 - Background/Aims: Evidence from spoken word recognition suggests that for English listeners, distinguishing full versus reduced vowels is important, but discerning stress differences involving the same full vowel (as in mu- from music or museum) is not. In Dutch, in contrast, the latter distinction is important. This difference arises from the relative frequency of unstressed full vowels in the two vocabularies. The goal of this paper is to determine how this difference in the lexicon influences the perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Methods: All possible sequences of two segments (diphones) in Dutch and in English were presented to native listeners in gated fragments. We recorded identification performance over time throughout the speech signal. The data were here analysed specifically for patterns in perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Results: The data reveal significantly larger stress effects (whereby unstressed vowels are harder to identify than stressed vowels) in English than in Dutch. Both language-specific and shared patterns appear regarding which vowels show stress effects. Conclusion: We explain the larger stress effect in English as reflecting the processing demands caused by the difference in use of unstressed vowels in the lexicon. The larger stress effect in English is due to relative inexperience with processing unstressed full vowels.

AB - Background/Aims: Evidence from spoken word recognition suggests that for English listeners, distinguishing full versus reduced vowels is important, but discerning stress differences involving the same full vowel (as in mu- from music or museum) is not. In Dutch, in contrast, the latter distinction is important. This difference arises from the relative frequency of unstressed full vowels in the two vocabularies. The goal of this paper is to determine how this difference in the lexicon influences the perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Methods: All possible sequences of two segments (diphones) in Dutch and in English were presented to native listeners in gated fragments. We recorded identification performance over time throughout the speech signal. The data were here analysed specifically for patterns in perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Results: The data reveal significantly larger stress effects (whereby unstressed vowels are harder to identify than stressed vowels) in English than in Dutch. Both language-specific and shared patterns appear regarding which vowels show stress effects. Conclusion: We explain the larger stress effect in English as reflecting the processing demands caused by the difference in use of unstressed vowels in the lexicon. The larger stress effect in English is due to relative inexperience with processing unstressed full vowels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991204657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991204657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000447428

DO - 10.1159/000447428

M3 - Article

C2 - 27710964

AN - SCOPUS:84991204657

SP - 81

EP - 106

JO - Phonetica

JF - Phonetica

SN - 0031-8388

ER -