Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement

Ted Grossardt, Keiron Bailey, Joel Brumm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public involvement in transportation planning and design has a problematic history. Professionals lack access to a coherent, organized method for communicating with the public, and some important principles of public involvement known to community design professionals are still being discovered by transportation professionals. A protocol, structured public involvement (SPI), is proposed. SPI was designed to ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the professional and the public. Principles of SPI are presented, and a series of steps useful for engaging the general public in a complex design or planning problem is given. SPI is intended to be transparent, accountable, democratic, and efficient. SPI places the use of technology within a public involvement framework built on community design experience. While technology can be useful, it must be placed in a social context. That is, various technologies are used because they can address such problems as lack of access to information, inconvenient and time-consuming meetings, confusing terms and graphics, and one-way communication. Highlights and examples are drawn from practical experience, where SPI protocols have been designed and used to solve problems of route planning, highway design, and transit-oriented development. While each problem set called for a different mix of technical tools, the protocol within which those tools were used was the same, with similar encouraging results. With SPI, public participation is less contentious and more informed, and the professional has information of high quality with which to begin the design process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-102
Number of pages8
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1858
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Planning
Highway engineering
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Structured Public Involvement : Problems and Prospects for Improvement. / Grossardt, Ted; Bailey, Keiron; Brumm, Joel.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1858, 2003, p. 95-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58c579028f5d42e5958dd56b24d48b1d,
title = "Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement",
abstract = "Public involvement in transportation planning and design has a problematic history. Professionals lack access to a coherent, organized method for communicating with the public, and some important principles of public involvement known to community design professionals are still being discovered by transportation professionals. A protocol, structured public involvement (SPI), is proposed. SPI was designed to ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the professional and the public. Principles of SPI are presented, and a series of steps useful for engaging the general public in a complex design or planning problem is given. SPI is intended to be transparent, accountable, democratic, and efficient. SPI places the use of technology within a public involvement framework built on community design experience. While technology can be useful, it must be placed in a social context. That is, various technologies are used because they can address such problems as lack of access to information, inconvenient and time-consuming meetings, confusing terms and graphics, and one-way communication. Highlights and examples are drawn from practical experience, where SPI protocols have been designed and used to solve problems of route planning, highway design, and transit-oriented development. While each problem set called for a different mix of technical tools, the protocol within which those tools were used was the same, with similar encouraging results. With SPI, public participation is less contentious and more informed, and the professional has information of high quality with which to begin the design process.",
author = "Ted Grossardt and Keiron Bailey and Joel Brumm",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "95--102",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1858",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured Public Involvement

T2 - Problems and Prospects for Improvement

AU - Grossardt, Ted

AU - Bailey, Keiron

AU - Brumm, Joel

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Public involvement in transportation planning and design has a problematic history. Professionals lack access to a coherent, organized method for communicating with the public, and some important principles of public involvement known to community design professionals are still being discovered by transportation professionals. A protocol, structured public involvement (SPI), is proposed. SPI was designed to ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the professional and the public. Principles of SPI are presented, and a series of steps useful for engaging the general public in a complex design or planning problem is given. SPI is intended to be transparent, accountable, democratic, and efficient. SPI places the use of technology within a public involvement framework built on community design experience. While technology can be useful, it must be placed in a social context. That is, various technologies are used because they can address such problems as lack of access to information, inconvenient and time-consuming meetings, confusing terms and graphics, and one-way communication. Highlights and examples are drawn from practical experience, where SPI protocols have been designed and used to solve problems of route planning, highway design, and transit-oriented development. While each problem set called for a different mix of technical tools, the protocol within which those tools were used was the same, with similar encouraging results. With SPI, public participation is less contentious and more informed, and the professional has information of high quality with which to begin the design process.

AB - Public involvement in transportation planning and design has a problematic history. Professionals lack access to a coherent, organized method for communicating with the public, and some important principles of public involvement known to community design professionals are still being discovered by transportation professionals. A protocol, structured public involvement (SPI), is proposed. SPI was designed to ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the professional and the public. Principles of SPI are presented, and a series of steps useful for engaging the general public in a complex design or planning problem is given. SPI is intended to be transparent, accountable, democratic, and efficient. SPI places the use of technology within a public involvement framework built on community design experience. While technology can be useful, it must be placed in a social context. That is, various technologies are used because they can address such problems as lack of access to information, inconvenient and time-consuming meetings, confusing terms and graphics, and one-way communication. Highlights and examples are drawn from practical experience, where SPI protocols have been designed and used to solve problems of route planning, highway design, and transit-oriented development. While each problem set called for a different mix of technical tools, the protocol within which those tools were used was the same, with similar encouraging results. With SPI, public participation is less contentious and more informed, and the professional has information of high quality with which to begin the design process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142710176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142710176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:2142710176

SP - 95

EP - 102

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1858

ER -