Students’ Ideas about How and Why Chemical Reactions Happen: Mapping the conceptual landscape

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research in science education has revealed that many students struggle to understand chemical reactions. Improving teaching and learning about chemical processes demands that we develop a clearer understanding of student reasoning in this area and of how this reasoning evolves with training in the domain. Thus, we have carried out a qualitative study to explore students reasoning about chemical causality and mechanism. Study participants included individuals at different educational levels, from college to graduate school. We identified diverse conceptual modes expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different types of reactions. Main findings indicate that student reasoning about chemical reactions is influenced by the nature of the process. More advanced students tended to express conceptual modes that were more normative and had more explanatory power, but major conceptual difficulties persisted in their reasoning. The results of our study are relevant to educators interested in conceptual development, learning progressions, and assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3066-3092
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume37
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2015

Fingerprint

student
school graduate
causality
learning
educator
Teaching
science
education

Keywords

  • Chemistry education
  • Conceptual development
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Students’ Ideas about How and Why Chemical Reactions Happen : Mapping the conceptual landscape. / Yan, Fan; Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 37, No. 18, 12.12.2015, p. 3066-3092.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3751e104e56e4611b632d8dfb7a7fc52,
title = "Students’ Ideas about How and Why Chemical Reactions Happen: Mapping the conceptual landscape",
abstract = "Research in science education has revealed that many students struggle to understand chemical reactions. Improving teaching and learning about chemical processes demands that we develop a clearer understanding of student reasoning in this area and of how this reasoning evolves with training in the domain. Thus, we have carried out a qualitative study to explore students reasoning about chemical causality and mechanism. Study participants included individuals at different educational levels, from college to graduate school. We identified diverse conceptual modes expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different types of reactions. Main findings indicate that student reasoning about chemical reactions is influenced by the nature of the process. More advanced students tended to express conceptual modes that were more normative and had more explanatory power, but major conceptual difficulties persisted in their reasoning. The results of our study are relevant to educators interested in conceptual development, learning progressions, and assessment.",
keywords = "Chemistry education, Conceptual development, Qualitative research",
author = "Fan Yan and Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2015.1121414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3066--3092",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Students’ Ideas about How and Why Chemical Reactions Happen

T2 - Mapping the conceptual landscape

AU - Yan, Fan

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2015/12/12

Y1 - 2015/12/12

N2 - Research in science education has revealed that many students struggle to understand chemical reactions. Improving teaching and learning about chemical processes demands that we develop a clearer understanding of student reasoning in this area and of how this reasoning evolves with training in the domain. Thus, we have carried out a qualitative study to explore students reasoning about chemical causality and mechanism. Study participants included individuals at different educational levels, from college to graduate school. We identified diverse conceptual modes expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different types of reactions. Main findings indicate that student reasoning about chemical reactions is influenced by the nature of the process. More advanced students tended to express conceptual modes that were more normative and had more explanatory power, but major conceptual difficulties persisted in their reasoning. The results of our study are relevant to educators interested in conceptual development, learning progressions, and assessment.

AB - Research in science education has revealed that many students struggle to understand chemical reactions. Improving teaching and learning about chemical processes demands that we develop a clearer understanding of student reasoning in this area and of how this reasoning evolves with training in the domain. Thus, we have carried out a qualitative study to explore students reasoning about chemical causality and mechanism. Study participants included individuals at different educational levels, from college to graduate school. We identified diverse conceptual modes expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different types of reactions. Main findings indicate that student reasoning about chemical reactions is influenced by the nature of the process. More advanced students tended to express conceptual modes that were more normative and had more explanatory power, but major conceptual difficulties persisted in their reasoning. The results of our study are relevant to educators interested in conceptual development, learning progressions, and assessment.

KW - Chemistry education

KW - Conceptual development

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956821198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956821198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2015.1121414

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2015.1121414

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956821198

VL - 37

SP - 3066

EP - 3092

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 18

ER -