Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias Against Priming Effects

Samara Klar, Thomas Leeper, Joshua Robison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Scholars from across the social sciences argue that identities-such as race, ethnicity, and gender- A re highly influential over individuals' attitudes, actions, and evaluations. Experiments are becoming particularly integral for allowing identity scholars to explain how these social attachments shape our political behavior. In this letter, we draw attention to how identity scholars should approach the common practice of assessing moderators, measuring control variables, and detecting effect heterogeneity using covariates. Special care must be taken when deciding where to place measures of demographic covariates in identity-related experiments, as these cases pose unique challenges from how scholars traditionally approach experimental design. We argue in this letter that identity scholars, particularly those whose subjects identify as women or minorities, are often right to measure covariates of interest posttreatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-60
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • Identities
  • experimental design
  • experiments
  • posttreatment bias
  • priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias Against Priming Effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this