Subclinical effects of smoking. Physiologic comparison of healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers and interrelationships of lung function measurements

R. J. Knudson, John W Bloom, D. E. Knudson, W. T. Kaltenborn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurements of ventilatory function, distribution of ventilation, diffusing capacity, and lung mechanics were made on healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers drawn from a randomly selected population in order to assess the effects of cigarette smoking and the interrelationships of the several indices of lung function. Although very few subjects had abnormal function, there were significant differences in most indices of function between smokers and nonsmokers. For the total group studied, there were significant correlations between various indices of function. A significant proportion of the variance in diffusing capacity and in diffusing capacity per liter of lung volume can be accounted for by an index of lung recoil which may, in turn, be related to size of terminal air spaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-29
Number of pages10
JournalChest
Volume86
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Smoking
Lung
Lung Volume Measurements
Mechanics
Ventilation
Air
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Subclinical effects of smoking. Physiologic comparison of healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers and interrelationships of lung function measurements. / Knudson, R. J.; Bloom, John W; Knudson, D. E.; Kaltenborn, W. T.

In: Chest, Vol. 86, No. 1, 1984, p. 20-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e407532ba5f4e85865dfc0871e4f475,
title = "Subclinical effects of smoking. Physiologic comparison of healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers and interrelationships of lung function measurements",
abstract = "Measurements of ventilatory function, distribution of ventilation, diffusing capacity, and lung mechanics were made on healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers drawn from a randomly selected population in order to assess the effects of cigarette smoking and the interrelationships of the several indices of lung function. Although very few subjects had abnormal function, there were significant differences in most indices of function between smokers and nonsmokers. For the total group studied, there were significant correlations between various indices of function. A significant proportion of the variance in diffusing capacity and in diffusing capacity per liter of lung volume can be accounted for by an index of lung recoil which may, in turn, be related to size of terminal air spaces.",
author = "Knudson, {R. J.} and Bloom, {John W} and Knudson, {D. E.} and Kaltenborn, {W. T.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "20--29",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subclinical effects of smoking. Physiologic comparison of healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers and interrelationships of lung function measurements

AU - Knudson, R. J.

AU - Bloom, John W

AU - Knudson, D. E.

AU - Kaltenborn, W. T.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Measurements of ventilatory function, distribution of ventilation, diffusing capacity, and lung mechanics were made on healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers drawn from a randomly selected population in order to assess the effects of cigarette smoking and the interrelationships of the several indices of lung function. Although very few subjects had abnormal function, there were significant differences in most indices of function between smokers and nonsmokers. For the total group studied, there were significant correlations between various indices of function. A significant proportion of the variance in diffusing capacity and in diffusing capacity per liter of lung volume can be accounted for by an index of lung recoil which may, in turn, be related to size of terminal air spaces.

AB - Measurements of ventilatory function, distribution of ventilation, diffusing capacity, and lung mechanics were made on healthy middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers drawn from a randomly selected population in order to assess the effects of cigarette smoking and the interrelationships of the several indices of lung function. Although very few subjects had abnormal function, there were significant differences in most indices of function between smokers and nonsmokers. For the total group studied, there were significant correlations between various indices of function. A significant proportion of the variance in diffusing capacity and in diffusing capacity per liter of lung volume can be accounted for by an index of lung recoil which may, in turn, be related to size of terminal air spaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021142373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021142373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6734286

AN - SCOPUS:0021142373

VL - 86

SP - 20

EP - 29

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1

ER -