Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English

The role of syntactic hierarchy

Julie Franck, Gabriella Vigliocco, Janet L Nicol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report two parallel experiments conducted in French and in English in which we induced subject-verb agreement errors to explore the role of syntactic structure during sentence production. Previous studies have shown that attraction errors (i.e., a tendency of the verb to agree with an immediately preceding noun instead of with the subject of the sentence) occur when a preverbal local noun disagrees in number with the subject head noun. The attraction effect was accounted for either by the proximity of the local noun to the verb in the linearised sentence (linear distance hypothesis) or by the processing simultaneity of the head and local nouns situated in the same clause (clause packaging hypothesis). In the current experiments, speakers were asked to complete complex sentential preambles. Contrary to the predictions of these two hypotheses, we found that agreement errors were more frequent following an intermediate modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the presidents-P of the company-S ARE serious) than an immediately preverbal modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the president-S of the companies-P ARE serious). It is suggested that attraction is determined by the syntactic distance between the interfering noun and the head noun at a stage of the grammatical encoding of the sentence during which syntactic units are organised into a hierarchical structure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-404
Number of pages34
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head
president
threat
experiment
Product Packaging
Nouns
Subject-verb Agreement
Syntax
Attraction
Clause
Verbs
Modifier
Experiment
Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English : The role of syntactic hierarchy. / Franck, Julie; Vigliocco, Gabriella; Nicol, Janet L.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 17, No. 4, 08.2002, p. 371-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12ec7cf963a44be8b3d475cd77c61929,
title = "Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy",
abstract = "We report two parallel experiments conducted in French and in English in which we induced subject-verb agreement errors to explore the role of syntactic structure during sentence production. Previous studies have shown that attraction errors (i.e., a tendency of the verb to agree with an immediately preceding noun instead of with the subject of the sentence) occur when a preverbal local noun disagrees in number with the subject head noun. The attraction effect was accounted for either by the proximity of the local noun to the verb in the linearised sentence (linear distance hypothesis) or by the processing simultaneity of the head and local nouns situated in the same clause (clause packaging hypothesis). In the current experiments, speakers were asked to complete complex sentential preambles. Contrary to the predictions of these two hypotheses, we found that agreement errors were more frequent following an intermediate modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the presidents-P of the company-S ARE serious) than an immediately preverbal modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the president-S of the companies-P ARE serious). It is suggested that attraction is determined by the syntactic distance between the interfering noun and the head noun at a stage of the grammatical encoding of the sentence during which syntactic units are organised into a hierarchical structure.",
author = "Julie Franck and Gabriella Vigliocco and Nicol, {Janet L}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/01690960143000254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "371--404",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English

T2 - The role of syntactic hierarchy

AU - Franck, Julie

AU - Vigliocco, Gabriella

AU - Nicol, Janet L

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - We report two parallel experiments conducted in French and in English in which we induced subject-verb agreement errors to explore the role of syntactic structure during sentence production. Previous studies have shown that attraction errors (i.e., a tendency of the verb to agree with an immediately preceding noun instead of with the subject of the sentence) occur when a preverbal local noun disagrees in number with the subject head noun. The attraction effect was accounted for either by the proximity of the local noun to the verb in the linearised sentence (linear distance hypothesis) or by the processing simultaneity of the head and local nouns situated in the same clause (clause packaging hypothesis). In the current experiments, speakers were asked to complete complex sentential preambles. Contrary to the predictions of these two hypotheses, we found that agreement errors were more frequent following an intermediate modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the presidents-P of the company-S ARE serious) than an immediately preverbal modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the president-S of the companies-P ARE serious). It is suggested that attraction is determined by the syntactic distance between the interfering noun and the head noun at a stage of the grammatical encoding of the sentence during which syntactic units are organised into a hierarchical structure.

AB - We report two parallel experiments conducted in French and in English in which we induced subject-verb agreement errors to explore the role of syntactic structure during sentence production. Previous studies have shown that attraction errors (i.e., a tendency of the verb to agree with an immediately preceding noun instead of with the subject of the sentence) occur when a preverbal local noun disagrees in number with the subject head noun. The attraction effect was accounted for either by the proximity of the local noun to the verb in the linearised sentence (linear distance hypothesis) or by the processing simultaneity of the head and local nouns situated in the same clause (clause packaging hypothesis). In the current experiments, speakers were asked to complete complex sentential preambles. Contrary to the predictions of these two hypotheses, we found that agreement errors were more frequent following an intermediate modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the presidents-P of the company-S ARE serious) than an immediately preverbal modifier (e.g., *The threat-S to the president-S of the companies-P ARE serious). It is suggested that attraction is determined by the syntactic distance between the interfering noun and the head noun at a stage of the grammatical encoding of the sentence during which syntactic units are organised into a hierarchical structure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036688018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036688018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690960143000254

DO - 10.1080/01690960143000254

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 371

EP - 404

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 4

ER -